On Fri, Feb 16, 2024 at 3:14 PM Melanie Plageman
wrote:
> [ review comments ]
Since there has been no response to these review comments for more
than 3 months, I have set https://commitfest.postgresql.org/48/4679/
to Returned with Feedback. Please feel free to update the status when
there is a
On Fri, Feb 16, 2024 at 12:50 PM Tomas Vondra
wrote:
>
> Hello Gabriele,
>
> I think the improvement makes sense (it's indeed a bit strange to not
> partition the history table), and the patch looks good.
>
> I did think about whether this should be optional in some way - that is,
> separate from
Hello Gabriele,
I think the improvement makes sense (it's indeed a bit strange to not
partition the history table), and the patch looks good.
I did think about whether this should be optional in some way - that is,
separate from partitioning the accounts table, and users would have to
explicitly
Hi Abhijit,
Thanks for your input. Please accept my updated patch.
Ciao,
Gabriele
On Tue, 16 Jan 2024 at 12:53, Abhijit Menon-Sen wrote:
> At 2023-11-30 11:29:15 +0100, gabriele.bartol...@enterprisedb.com wrote:
> >
> > With the attached patch, I extend the partitioning capability to the
> >
At 2023-11-30 11:29:15 +0100, gabriele.bartol...@enterprisedb.com wrote:
>
> With the attached patch, I extend the partitioning capability to the
> pgbench_history table too.
>
> I have been thinking of adding an option to control this, but I preferred
> to ask in this list whether it really
Sorry, I did not intend to send this message for this email. I by
mistake sent this mail. Please ignore this mail
On Wed, 10 Jan 2024 at 15:27, Shlok Kyal wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> There are some test failures reported by Cfbot at [1]:
>
> [09:15:01.794] 192/276 postgresql:pgbench /
>
Hi,
There are some test failures reported by Cfbot at [1]:
[09:15:01.794] 192/276 postgresql:pgbench /
pgbench/001_pgbench_with_server ERROR 7.48s exit status 3
[09:15:01.794] >>>
INITDB_TEMPLATE=/tmp/cirrus-ci-build/build/tmp_install/initdb-template
Please discard the previous patch and use this one (it had a leftover
comment from an initial attempt to limit this to hash case).
Thanks,
Gabriele
On Thu, 30 Nov 2023 at 11:29, Gabriele Bartolini <
gabriele.bartol...@enterprisedb.com> wrote:
> Hi there,
>
> While benchmarking a new feature
Hi there,
While benchmarking a new feature involving tablespace support in
CloudNativePG (Kubernetes operator), I wanted to try out the partitioning
feature of pgbench. I saw it supporting both range and hash partitioning,
but limited to pgbench_accounts.
With the attached patch, I extend the
