On 2/21/21 10:34 PM, Andres Freund wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On 2021-02-17 15:18:02 -0500, Andrew Dunstan wrote:
>> yeah. The cfbot runs check-world which makes it difficult for it to know
>> which log files to show when there's an error. That's a major part of
>> the reason the buildfarm runs a much fine
On 2/21/21 9:28 PM, Thomas Munro wrote:
> On Sat, Feb 20, 2021 at 3:54 AM Andrew Dunstan wrote:
>> here's a very small and simple (and possibly naive) POC patch that
>> demonstrates this and seems to do the right thing.
> As a small variation that might be more parallelism-friendly, would it
>
Hi,
On 2021-02-17 15:18:02 -0500, Andrew Dunstan wrote:
> yeah. The cfbot runs check-world which makes it difficult for it to know
> which log files to show when there's an error. That's a major part of
> the reason the buildfarm runs a much finer grained set of steps.
I really think we need a be
On Sat, Feb 20, 2021 at 3:54 AM Andrew Dunstan wrote:
> here's a very small and simple (and possibly naive) POC patch that
> demonstrates this and seems to do the right thing.
As a small variation that might be more parallelism-friendly, would it
be better to touch a file with a known name in an
On Sat, Feb 20, 2021 at 11:33 AM Thomas Munro wrote:
> On Sat, Feb 20, 2021 at 10:31 AM Peter Smith wrote:
> > Here is another related question about the cfbot error reporting -
> >
> > The main cfbot "status page" [1] still shows a couple of fails for the
> > 32/2914 (for freebsd & linux). But l
On Sat, Feb 20, 2021 at 10:31 AM Peter Smith wrote:
> Here is another related question about the cfbot error reporting -
>
> The main cfbot "status page" [1] still shows a couple of fails for the
> 32/2914 (for freebsd & linux). But looking more closely, those fails
> are not from the latest run.
Here is another related question about the cfbot error reporting -
The main cfbot "status page" [1] still shows a couple of fails for the
32/2914 (for freebsd & linux). But looking more closely, those fails
are not from the latest run. e.g. I also found this execution
"history" page [2] for our pa
On 2/18/21 11:01 AM, Andrew Dunstan wrote:
> On 2/17/21 3:42 PM, Thomas Munro wrote:
>> On Thu, Feb 18, 2021 at 9:18 AM Andrew Dunstan wrote:
>>> On 2/17/21 11:06 AM, Tom Lane wrote:
Peter Smith writes:
> I saw that one of our commitfest entries (32/2914) is recently
> reporting a f
On 2/17/21 3:42 PM, Thomas Munro wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 18, 2021 at 9:18 AM Andrew Dunstan wrote:
>> On 2/17/21 11:06 AM, Tom Lane wrote:
>>> Peter Smith writes:
I saw that one of our commitfest entries (32/2914) is recently
reporting a fail on the cfbot site [1]. I thought this was all
On Thu, Feb 18, 2021 at 9:55 AM Thomas Munro wrote:
>
> On Thu, Feb 18, 2021 at 9:42 AM Thomas Munro wrote:
> > ... (there have been a few random terminations I can't explain
> > recently, but they look different, I think there was a Google Compute
> > Engine outage that might explain that), ...
On Thu, Feb 18, 2021 at 9:42 AM Thomas Munro wrote:
> ... (there have been a few random terminations I can't explain
> recently, but they look different, I think there was a Google Compute
> Engine outage that might explain that), ...
There's also occasionally a failure like this[1], on FreeBSD o
On Thu, Feb 18, 2021 at 9:18 AM Andrew Dunstan wrote:
> On 2/17/21 11:06 AM, Tom Lane wrote:
> > Peter Smith writes:
> >> I saw that one of our commitfest entries (32/2914) is recently
> >> reporting a fail on the cfbot site [1]. I thought this was all ok a
> >> few days ago.
> >> ...
> >> Is the
On 2/17/21 11:06 AM, Tom Lane wrote:
> Peter Smith writes:
>> I saw that one of our commitfest entries (32/2914) is recently
>> reporting a fail on the cfbot site [1]. I thought this was all ok a
>> few days ago.
>> ...
>> Is there any other detailed information available anywhere, e.g.
>> logs?
Peter Smith writes:
> I saw that one of our commitfest entries (32/2914) is recently
> reporting a fail on the cfbot site [1]. I thought this was all ok a
> few days ago.
> ...
> Is there any other detailed information available anywhere, e.g.
> logs?, which might help us work out what was the cau
Hi -
I saw that one of our commitfest entries (32/2914) is recently
reporting a fail on the cfbot site [1]. I thought this was all ok a
few days ago.
We can see the test log indicating what was the test that failed [2]
Test Summary Report
---
t/002_twophase_streaming.pl (Wstat: 74
15 matches
Mail list logo
