On Thu, 28 Jun 2018 10:26:13 -0400
Robert Haas wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 27, 2018 at 9:22 AM, Yugo Nagata wrote:
> > According to the syntax in ALTER INDEX doc, a column should be specified by
> > column number as discussed in [1]. However, the current code still allows to
> > use an internal column
On Wed, Jun 27, 2018 at 9:22 AM, Yugo Nagata wrote:
> According to the syntax in ALTER INDEX doc, a column should be specified by
> column number as discussed in [1]. However, the current code still allows to
> use an internal column name like "expr". Is this intentional?
>
> Although it is
Hi,
According to the syntax in ALTER INDEX doc, a column should be specified by
column number as discussed in [1]. However, the current code still allows to
use an internal column name like "expr". Is this intentional?
Although it is harmless, how about forbiding this undocumented and
unuseful
