Andres Freund writes:
> On 2019-05-23 14:05:19 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
>> I think you're vastly overstating the case for refusing support for this.
>> Adding "#ifndef FRONTEND" to relevant headers isn't a huge amount of work
>> --- it's certainly far less of a problem than the Microsoft-droppings
Hi,
On 2019-05-23 14:05:19 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> Andres Freund writes:
> > On 2019-05-23 13:46:15 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> >> I'm not really excited about adopting a position that PG will only
> >> build on GCC and clones thereof.
>
> > That's not what I said though? Not supporting one
Andres Freund writes:
> On 2019-05-23 13:46:15 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
>> I'm not really excited about adopting a position that PG will only
>> build on GCC and clones thereof.
> That's not what I said though? Not supporting one compiler, on an OS
> that's effectively not being developed anymore,
Hi,
On 2019-05-23 13:46:15 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> Andres Freund writes:
> > On 2019-05-22 16:13:02 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> >> It doesn't sound like "use a newer compiler" is going to be a helpful
> >> answer there.
>
> > Well, GCC is available on solaris, and IIRC not that hard to install
>
Andres Freund writes:
> On 2019-05-22 16:13:02 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
>> It doesn't sound like "use a newer compiler" is going to be a helpful
>> answer there.
> Well, GCC is available on solaris, and IIRC not that hard to install
> (isn't it just a 'pkg install gcc' or such?). Don't think we
Hi,
On 2019-05-22 16:13:02 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> Andres Freund writes:
> > On 2019-05-22 15:55:50 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> Per Bjorn's report:
> >> The compiler used in Sun Studio 12u1, very old and and I can try to
> >> upgrade and see if that helps.
> > I tried Sun Studio 12u2 and then a
Andres Freund writes:
> On 2019-05-22 15:55:50 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
>>> So the disturbing thing here is that we no longer have any active
>>> buildfarm members that can build HEAD but have the won't-elide-
>>> unused-static-functions problem. Clearly we'd better close that
>>> gap somehow ...
Hi,
On 2019-05-22 15:55:50 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> I wrote:
> >> Our Solaris packager reports that 12beta1 is failing to build for him
> >> on some Solaris variants:
> >>> The link failure is:
> >>> Undefined first referenced
> >>> symbolin file
> >>>
I wrote:
>> Our Solaris packager reports that 12beta1 is failing to build for him
>> on some Solaris variants:
>>> The link failure is:
>>> Undefined first referenced
>>> symbol in file
>>> ReadNextFullTransactionId pg_checksums.o
> On looking
I wrote:
> Our Solaris packager reports that 12beta1 is failing to build for him
> on some Solaris variants:
>> The link failure is:
>> ---
>> Undefinedfirst referenced
>> symbol in file
>> ReadNextFullTransactionId pg_checksums.o
>> ld:
Our Solaris packager reports that 12beta1 is failing to build for him
on some Solaris variants:
> The link failure is:
> ---
> Undefined first referenced
> symbol in file
> ReadNextFullTransactionId pg_checksums.o
> ld: fatal: symbol
11 matches
Mail list logo
