Hello.
At Fri, 3 Aug 2018 15:42:22 -0700, Peter Geoghegan wrote in
> On Fri, Aug 3, 2018 at 12:34 AM, Kyotaro HORIGUCHI
> wrote:
> >> I reread through the thread and IUCC, drop_index() is sending
> >> inval on the owing relation and invalidation happens (that is,
> >
> > I finally understand
On Fri, Aug 3, 2018 at 12:34 AM, Kyotaro HORIGUCHI
wrote:
>> I reread through the thread and IUCC, drop_index() is sending
>> inval on the owing relation and invalidation happens (that is,
>
> I finally understand that I was totally inept. This came from
> *the result* of the original -bug
At Wed, 1 Aug 2018 09:25:18 -0700, Andres Freund wrote in
<20180801162518.jnb2ql5dfmgwp...@alap3.anarazel.de>
> Hi,
>
> The issue at [1] is caused by missing invalidations, and [2] seems like
> a likely candidate too. I wonder if it'd be good to have a relcache test
> mode akin to
Hello.
At Fri, 03 Aug 2018 10:54:46 +0900 (Tokyo Standard Time), Kyotaro HORIGUCHI
wrote in
<20180803.105446.155966888.horiguchi.kyot...@lab.ntt.co.jp>
> I reread through the thread and IUCC, drop_index() is sending
> inval on the owing relation and invalidation happens (that is,
I finally
At Thu, 2 Aug 2018 14:40:50 -0700, Peter Geoghegan wrote in
pg> On Thu, Aug 2, 2018 at 3:18 AM, Kyotaro HORIGUCHI
pg> wrote:
pg> >> [1]
http://archives.postgresql.org/message-id/CAKoxK%2B5fVodiCtMsXKV_1YAKXbzwSfp7DgDqUmcUAzeAhf%3DHEQ%40mail.gmail.com
pg> >> [2]
On Thu, Aug 2, 2018 at 3:18 AM, Kyotaro HORIGUCHI
wrote:
>> [1]
>> http://archives.postgresql.org/message-id/CAKoxK%2B5fVodiCtMsXKV_1YAKXbzwSfp7DgDqUmcUAzeAhf%3DHEQ%40mail.gmail.com
>> [2] https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/12259.1532117...@sss.pgh.pa.us
>
> As for [1], it is not a issue on
Hi,
On 2018-08-02 19:18:11 +0900, Kyotaro HORIGUCHI wrote:
> At Wed, 1 Aug 2018 09:25:18 -0700, Andres Freund wrote
> in <20180801162518.jnb2ql5dfmgwp...@alap3.anarazel.de>
> > Hi,
> >
> > The issue at [1] is caused by missing invalidations, and [2] seems like
> > a likely candidate too. I
Hello.
At Wed, 1 Aug 2018 09:25:18 -0700, Andres Freund wrote in
<20180801162518.jnb2ql5dfmgwp...@alap3.anarazel.de>
> Hi,
>
> The issue at [1] is caused by missing invalidations, and [2] seems like
> a likely candidate too. I wonder if it'd be good to have a relcache test
> mode akin to
Hi,
The issue at [1] is caused by missing invalidations, and [2] seems like
a likely candidate too. I wonder if it'd be good to have a relcache test
mode akin to CLOBBER_CACHE_ALWAYS and RELCACHE_FORCE_RELEASE, that tries
to ensure that we've done sufficiently to ensure the right invalidations
