Re: Improving psql slash usage help message

2020-11-29 Thread Anastasia Lubennikova
On 02.11.2020 18:02, Anastasia Lubennikova wrote: Status update for a commitfest entry. This thread was inactive for a while. Is anyone going to continue working on it? My two cents on the topic: I don’t see it as a big problem in the first place. In the source code, \dE refers to foreign table

Re: Improving psql slash usage help message

2020-11-02 Thread Anastasia Lubennikova
Status update for a commitfest entry. This thread was inactive for a while. Is anyone going to continue working on it? My two cents on the topic: I don’t see it as a big problem in the first place. In the source code, \dE refers to foreign tables and \de refers to forign servers. So, it seems mo

Re: Improving psql slash usage help message

2020-07-21 Thread Peter Eisentraut
On 2020-07-21 17:10, Tom Lane wrote: Hamid Akhtar writes: So are you suggesting to not fix this or do a more detailed review and assess what other psql messages can be grouped together. I was just imagining merging the entries for the commands that are implemented by listTables(). If you see

Re: Improving psql slash usage help message

2020-07-21 Thread Tom Lane
Hamid Akhtar writes: > So are you suggesting to not fix this or do a more detailed review and > assess what other psql messages can be grouped together. I was just imagining merging the entries for the commands that are implemented by listTables(). If you see something else that would be worth d

Re: Improving psql slash usage help message

2020-07-21 Thread Hamid Akhtar
So are you suggesting to not fix this or do a more detailed review and assess what other psql messages can be grouped together. On Sun, Jul 12, 2020 at 8:15 PM Tom Lane wrote: > Hamid Akhtar writes: > > On Sun, Apr 26, 2020 at 1:03 AM David G. Johnston < > > david.g.johns...@gmail.com> wrote: >

Re: Improving psql slash usage help message

2020-07-12 Thread Tom Lane
Hamid Akhtar writes: > On Sun, Apr 26, 2020 at 1:03 AM David G. Johnston < > david.g.johns...@gmail.com> wrote: >> On Sat, Apr 25, 2020 at 12:29 PM Hamid Akhtar >> wrote: >>> "\dE" displays the list with a "List of relations" heading whereas "\det" >>> displays "List of foreign tables". So, to di

Re: Improving psql slash usage help message

2020-06-08 Thread ahsan hadi
The following review has been posted through the commitfest application: make installcheck-world: tested, passed Implements feature: not tested Spec compliant: not tested Documentation:tested, passed This small documentation patch makes the document more accurate for p

Re: Improving psql slash usage help message

2020-04-27 Thread Hamid Akhtar
On Sun, Apr 26, 2020 at 1:03 AM David G. Johnston < david.g.johns...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Sat, Apr 25, 2020 at 12:29 PM Hamid Akhtar > wrote: > >> >> "\dE" displays the list with a "List of relations" heading whereas "\det" >> displays "List of foreign tables". So, to differentiate the two, I s

Re: Improving psql slash usage help message

2020-04-25 Thread David G. Johnston
On Sat, Apr 25, 2020 at 12:29 PM Hamid Akhtar wrote: > > "\dE" displays the list with a "List of relations" heading whereas "\det" > displays "List of foreign tables". So, to differentiate the two, I suggest > to change the help message for "\dE" to: > > \dE[S+] [PATTERN] list foreign rela

Improving psql slash usage help message

2020-04-25 Thread Hamid Akhtar
psql slash usage show two options for listing foreign tables. \dE[S+] [PATTERN] list foreign tables \det[+] [PATTERN] list foreign tables This seems a little odd especially when the output of both of these commands is different. postgres=# \dE+ List of relations Schema