On Wed, Sep 14, 2022 at 5:25 PM John Naylor
wrote:
> Will commit this way unless there are objections.
I forgot to mention yesterday, but this is done.
--
John Naylor
EDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
On 2022-Sep-14, John Naylor wrote:
> This one
>
> + errmsg("background worker \"%s\": background workers without shared
> memory access are not supported",
>
> is a grammar error so worth backpatching, but the rest are cosmetic.
>
> Will commit this way unless there are objections.
+1
--
On Wed, Sep 14, 2022 at 5:01 PM Ekaterina Kiryanova
wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> When translating error messages, Alexander Lakhin
> () noticed some inconsistencies so I prepared a
> small patch to fix those.
+1
This one
- errmsg("background worker \"%s\": background worker without shared
memory access
Hi,
When translating error messages, Alexander Lakhin
() noticed some inconsistencies so I prepared a
small patch to fix those.
Please see attached.
--
Ekaterina Kiryanova
Technical Writer
Postgres Professional
the Russian PostgreSQL Companydiff --git
