On Tue, Aug 12, 2025 at 08:58:47AM +0900, Michael Paquier wrote:
> I would suggest waiting a bit for the resolution of the other bug, and
> make sure that we have at least one reference to the trick with the DO
> block. While the way you are writing the test is more readable,
> there's also a case
On Tue, Aug 12, 2025 at 08:58:47AM +0900, Michael Paquier wrote:
> CREATE FOREIGN TABLE analyze_ftable (id int, a text, b bigint)
> - SERVER loopback OPTIONS (table_name 'analyze_rtable1');
> + SERVER loopback OPTIONS (table_name 'analyze_table');
>
> Good catch. So what your patch i
On Mon, Aug 11, 2025 at 10:23:47AM -0400, Corey Huinker wrote:
> Patch 0001 concerns what appears to be a bug in the postgres_fdw regression
> tests.
>
> As it was, the tests set the sampling method for the foreign server, but
> rather than analyzing a table on that foreign server, the local table
Patch 0001 concerns what appears to be a bug in the postgres_fdw regression
tests.
As it was, the tests set the sampling method for the foreign server, but
rather than analyzing a table on that foreign server, the local table
analyze_table was analyzed instead.
The analyze commands now analyze a
