RE: Made ecpg compatibility mode and run-time behaviour options case insensitive

2021-02-08 Thread Tang, Haiying
From: Tom Lane Sent: Tuesday, February 9, 2021 1:14 AM >> When reading code related ECPG I found 75220fb was committed in PG13 and >> master. >> I don't know why it shouldn't be backpatched in PG12 or before. >> Can anyone take a look at this and kindly tell me why. > >We don't usually back-pat

Re: Made ecpg compatibility mode and run-time behaviour options case insensitive

2021-02-08 Thread Tom Lane
"Tang, Haiying" writes: > When reading code related ECPG I found 75220fb was committed in PG13 and > master. > I don't know why it shouldn't be backpatched in PG12 or before. > Can anyone take a look at this and kindly tell me why. We don't usually back-patch things that aren't clear bug fixes.

Made ecpg compatibility mode and run-time behaviour options case insensitive

2021-02-08 Thread Tang, Haiying
Hi Hackers When reading code related ECPG I found 75220fb was committed in PG13 and master. I don't know why it shouldn't be backpatched in PG12 or before. Can anyone take a look at this and kindly tell me why. Regards, Tang