Hi Kuroda san,
> I think even if LRG is implemented as contrib modules or any extensions,
> it will deeply depend on the subscription option "origin" proposed in [1].
> So LRG cannot be used for older version, only PG16 or later.
Sorry, I misunderstood.
I understand now.
Regards,
Ryohei
Dear Takahashi-san,
Thanks for giving feedbacks!
> > I don't know if it requires the kind of code you are thinking but I
> > agree that it is worth considering implementing it as an extension.
>
> I think the other advantage to implement as an extension is that users could
> install the
Hi,
In addition to the use cases mentioned above, some users want to use n-way
replication of partial database.
The following is the typical use case.
* There are several data centers.
(ex. Japan and India)
* The database in each data center has its unique data.
(ex. the database in Japan
On Fri, Jun 10, 2022 at 12:40 PM Bharath Rupireddy
wrote:
>
> On Fri, Jun 10, 2022 at 9:54 AM Amit Kapila wrote:
> > >
> > > 1. Are you proposing to use logical replication subscribers to be in
> > > sync quorum? In other words, in an N-masters node, M (M >= N)-node
> > > configuration, will
On Fri, Jun 10, 2022 at 9:54 AM Amit Kapila wrote:
>
> On Thu, Jun 9, 2022 at 6:04 PM Bharath Rupireddy
> wrote:
> >
> > On Thu, Apr 28, 2022 at 5:20 AM Peter Smith wrote:
> > >
> > > MULTI-MASTER LOGICAL REPLICATION
> > >
> > > 1.0 BACK
On Thu, Jun 9, 2022 at 6:04 PM Bharath Rupireddy
wrote:
>
> On Thu, Apr 28, 2022 at 5:20 AM Peter Smith wrote:
> >
> > MULTI-MASTER LOGICAL REPLICATION
> >
> > 1.0 BACKGROUND
> >
> > Let’s assume that a user wishes to set up a multi-master environment
On Thu, Apr 28, 2022 at 5:20 AM Peter Smith wrote:
>
> MULTI-MASTER LOGICAL REPLICATION
>
> 1.0 BACKGROUND
>
> Let’s assume that a user wishes to set up a multi-master environment
> so that a set of PostgreSQL instances (nodes) use logical replication
> to share tabl
Dear hackers,
I found another use-case for LRG. It might be helpful for migration.
LRG for migration
--
LRG may be helpful for machine migration, OS upgrade,
or PostgreSQL itself upgrade.
Assumes that users want to migrate database to other environment,
On Fri, Jun 3, 2022 at 7:12 AM Bruce Momjian wrote:
>
> On Thu, Jun 2, 2022 at 05:12:49PM +1000, Peter Smith wrote:
> > On Thu, Jun 2, 2022 at 12:03 AM Bruce Momjian wrote:
> > >
> > > On Wed, Jun 1, 2022 at 10:27:27AM +0530, Amit Kapila wrote:
> > ...
> >
> > > My big point is that you should
On Thu, Jun 2, 2022 at 05:12:49PM +1000, Peter Smith wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 2, 2022 at 12:03 AM Bruce Momjian wrote:
> >
> > On Wed, Jun 1, 2022 at 10:27:27AM +0530, Amit Kapila wrote:
> ...
>
> > My big point is that you should not be showing up with a patch but
> > rather have these
On Thu, Jun 2, 2022 at 12:03 AM Bruce Momjian wrote:
>
> On Wed, Jun 1, 2022 at 10:27:27AM +0530, Amit Kapila wrote:
...
> My big point is that you should not be showing up with a patch but
> rather have these discussions to get agreement that this is the
> direction the community wants to go.
On Wed, Jun 1, 2022 at 7:33 PM Bruce Momjian wrote:
>
> On Wed, Jun 1, 2022 at 10:27:27AM +0530, Amit Kapila wrote:
> > On Tue, May 31, 2022 at 7:36 PM Bruce Momjian wrote:
> > > Uh, thinking some more, why would anyone set things up this way ---
> > > having part of a table being primary on
On Wed, Jun 1, 2022 at 10:27:27AM +0530, Amit Kapila wrote:
> On Tue, May 31, 2022 at 7:36 PM Bruce Momjian wrote:
> > Uh, thinking some more, why would anyone set things up this way ---
> > having part of a table being primary on one server and a different part
> > of the table be a subscriber.
On Tue, May 31, 2022 at 7:36 PM Bruce Momjian wrote:
>
> On Wed, May 25, 2022 at 10:32:50PM -0400, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> > On Wed, May 25, 2022 at 12:13:17PM +0530, Amit Kapila wrote:
> > >
> > > It helps with setting up logical replication among two or more nodes
> > > (data flows both ways)
On Wed, May 25, 2022 at 10:32:50PM -0400, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> On Wed, May 25, 2022 at 12:13:17PM +0530, Amit Kapila wrote:
> > > You still have not answered my question above. "Without these features,
> > > what workload would this help with?" You have only explained how the
> > > patch would
On Wed, May 25, 2022 at 12:13:17PM +0530, Amit Kapila wrote:
> > You still have not answered my question above. "Without these features,
> > what workload would this help with?" You have only explained how the
> > patch would fix one of the many larger problems.
> >
>
> It helps with setting up
On Wed, May 25, 2022 at 4:43 PM Amit Kapila wrote:
>
> On Tue, May 24, 2022 at 5:57 PM Bruce Momjian wrote:
> >
> > On Sat, May 14, 2022 at 12:20:05PM +0530, Amit Kapila wrote:
> > > On Sat, May 14, 2022 at 12:33 AM Bruce Momjian wrote:
> > > >
> > > > Uh, without these features, what workload
On Tue, May 24, 2022 at 5:57 PM Bruce Momjian wrote:
>
> On Sat, May 14, 2022 at 12:20:05PM +0530, Amit Kapila wrote:
> > On Sat, May 14, 2022 at 12:33 AM Bruce Momjian wrote:
> > >
> > > Uh, without these features, what workload would this help with?
> > >
> >
> > To allow replication among
On Sat, May 14, 2022 at 12:20:05PM +0530, Amit Kapila wrote:
> On Sat, May 14, 2022 at 12:33 AM Bruce Momjian wrote:
> >
> > Uh, without these features, what workload would this help with?
> >
>
> To allow replication among multiple nodes when some of the nodes may
> have pre-existing data. This
Hi hackers,
I created a small PoC. Please see the attached patches.
REQUIREMENT
Before patching them, patches in [1] must also be applied.
DIFFERENCES FROM PREVIOUS DESCRIPTIONS
* LRG is now implemented as SQL functions, not as a contrib module.
* New tables are added as system catalogs.
On Sat, May 14, 2022 at 12:33 AM Bruce Momjian wrote:
>
> Uh, without these features, what workload would this help with?
>
To allow replication among multiple nodes when some of the nodes may
have pre-existing data. This work plans to provide simple APIs to
achieve that. Now, let me try to
On Fri, Apr 29, 2022 at 07:05:11PM +1000, Peter Smith wrote:
> This MMLR proposal was mostly just to create an interface making it
> easier to use PostgreSQL core logical replication CREATE
> PUBLICATION/SUBSCRIPTION for table sharing among a set of nodes.
> Otherwise, this is difficult for a user
On Thu, Apr 28, 2022 at 5:20 AM Peter Smith wrote:
>
> MULTI-MASTER LOGICAL REPLICATION
>
> 1.0 BACKGROUND
>
> Let’s assume that a user wishes to set up a multi-master environment
> so that a set of PostgreSQL instances (nodes) use logical replication
> to share tabl
On Fri, Apr 29, 2022 at 2:35 PM Peter Smith wrote:
>
> On Fri, Apr 29, 2022 at 2:16 PM Yura Sokolov wrote:
> >
> > В Чт, 28/04/2022 в 17:37 +0530, vignesh C пишет:
> > > On Thu, Apr 28, 2022 at 4:24 PM Yura Sokolov
> > > wrote:
> > > > В Чт, 28/04/2022 в 09:49 +1000, Peter Smith пишет:
> > > >
On Fri, Apr 29, 2022 at 2:16 PM Yura Sokolov wrote:
>
> В Чт, 28/04/2022 в 17:37 +0530, vignesh C пишет:
> > On Thu, Apr 28, 2022 at 4:24 PM Yura Sokolov
> > wrote:
> > > В Чт, 28/04/2022 в 09:49 +1000, Peter Smith пишет:
> > >
> > > > 1.1 ADVANTAGES OF MMLR
> > > >
> > > > - Increases write
В Чт, 28/04/2022 в 17:37 +0530, vignesh C пишет:
> On Thu, Apr 28, 2022 at 4:24 PM Yura Sokolov wrote:
> > В Чт, 28/04/2022 в 09:49 +1000, Peter Smith пишет:
> >
> > > 1.1 ADVANTAGES OF MMLR
> > >
> > > - Increases write scalability (e.g., all nodes can write arbitrary data).
> >
> > I've
On Thu, Apr 28, 2022 at 4:24 PM Yura Sokolov wrote:
>
> В Чт, 28/04/2022 в 09:49 +1000, Peter Smith пишет:
>
> > 1.1 ADVANTAGES OF MMLR
> >
> > - Increases write scalability (e.g., all nodes can write arbitrary data).
>
> I've never heard how transactional-aware multimaster increases
> write
В Чт, 28/04/2022 в 09:49 +1000, Peter Smith пишет:
> 1.1 ADVANTAGES OF MMLR
>
> - Increases write scalability (e.g., all nodes can write arbitrary data).
I've never heard how transactional-aware multimaster increases
write scalability. More over, usually even non-transactional
multimaster
Dear Laurenz,
Thank you for your interest in our works!
> I am missing a discussion how replication conflicts are handled to
> prevent replication from breaking or the databases from drifting apart.
Actually we don't have plans for developing the feature that avoids conflict.
We think that it
On Thu, 2022-04-28 at 09:49 +1000, Peter Smith wrote:
> To prevent the circular recursive problem Vignesh is developing a
> patch [1] that introduces new SUBSCRIPTION options "local_only" (for
> publishing only data originating at the publisher node) and
> "copy_data=force". Using this patch, we
MULTI-MASTER LOGICAL REPLICATION
1.0 BACKGROUND
Let’s assume that a user wishes to set up a multi-master environment
so that a set of PostgreSQL instances (nodes) use logical replication
to share tables with every other node in the set.
We define this as a multi-master logical replication (MMLR
31 matches
Mail list logo
