Re: OpenSSL 3.0.0 vs old branches

2023-02-08 Thread Michael Paquier
On Wed, Feb 08, 2023 at 07:30:32AM -0500, Andrew Dunstan wrote: > In the last 30 days, only the following buildfarm animals have reported > running the ssl checks on the relevant branches: > >  gokiburi >  hachi FWIW, these two ones are using OpenSSL 1.1.1, so that's fine. -- Michael

Re: OpenSSL 3.0.0 vs old branches

2023-02-08 Thread Andrew Dunstan
On 2023-02-08 We 10:42, Peter Eisentraut wrote: On 07.02.23 19:28, Tom Lane wrote: I think Peter's misremembering the history, and OpenSSL 3*is* supported in these branches.  There could be an argument for not back-patching f0d2c65f17 on the grounds that pre-1.1.1 is also supported there.  On

Re: OpenSSL 3.0.0 vs old branches

2023-02-08 Thread Tom Lane
Erik Rijkers writes: > Op 08-02-2023 om 05:37 schreef Tom Lane: >> Question: is anybody around here still testing with 0.9.8 (or 1.0.x) >> at all? The systems I had that had that version on them are dead. > I've hoarded an old centos 6.1 system that I don't really use anymore > but sometimes

Re: OpenSSL 3.0.0 vs old branches

2023-02-08 Thread Peter Eisentraut
On 07.02.23 19:28, Tom Lane wrote: I think Peter's misremembering the history, and OpenSSL 3*is* supported in these branches. There could be an argument for not back-patching f0d2c65f17 on the grounds that pre-1.1.1 is also supported there. On the whole though, it seems more useful today for

Re: OpenSSL 3.0.0 vs old branches

2023-02-08 Thread Erik Rijkers
Op 08-02-2023 om 05:37 schreef Tom Lane: Michael Paquier writes: On Tue, Feb 07, 2023 at 01:28:26PM -0500, Tom Lane wrote: I think Peter's misremembering the history, and OpenSSL 3 *is* supported in these branches. There could be an argument for not back-patching f0d2c65f17 on the grounds

Re: OpenSSL 3.0.0 vs old branches

2023-02-08 Thread Andrew Dunstan
On 2023-02-07 Tu 23:37, Tom Lane wrote: Michael Paquier writes: On Tue, Feb 07, 2023 at 01:28:26PM -0500, Tom Lane wrote: I think Peter's misremembering the history, and OpenSSL 3 *is* supported in these branches. There could be an argument for not back-patching f0d2c65f17 on the grounds

Re: OpenSSL 3.0.0 vs old branches

2023-02-07 Thread Tom Lane
Michael Paquier writes: > On Tue, Feb 07, 2023 at 01:28:26PM -0500, Tom Lane wrote: >> I think Peter's misremembering the history, and OpenSSL 3 *is* >> supported in these branches. There could be an argument for >> not back-patching f0d2c65f17 on the grounds that pre-1.1.1 is >> also supported

Re: OpenSSL 3.0.0 vs old branches

2023-02-07 Thread Michael Paquier
On Tue, Feb 07, 2023 at 01:28:26PM -0500, Tom Lane wrote: > I double-checked this on Fedora 37 (openssl 3.0.5). v11 and v12 > do build --with-openssl. There are an annoyingly large number of > -Wdeprecated-declarations warnings, but those are there in v13 too. > I confirm that back-patching

Re: OpenSSL 3.0.0 vs old branches

2023-02-07 Thread Tom Lane
Andrew Dunstan writes: > On 2023-02-07 Tu 02:18, Peter Eisentraut wrote: >> This is not the only patch that we did to support OpenSSL 3.0.0. There >> was a very lengthy discussion that resulted in various patches.  >> Unless we have a complete analysis of what was done and how it affects >>

Re: OpenSSL 3.0.0 vs old branches

2023-02-07 Thread Andrew Dunstan
On 2023-02-07 Tu 02:18, Peter Eisentraut wrote: On 06.02.23 16:56, Andrew Dunstan wrote: I recently moved crake to a new machine running Fedora 36, which has OpenSSL 3.0.0. This causes the SSL tests to fail on branches earlier than release 13, so I propose to backpatch commit f0d2c65f17 to

Re: OpenSSL 3.0.0 vs old branches

2023-02-06 Thread Peter Eisentraut
On 06.02.23 16:56, Andrew Dunstan wrote: I recently moved crake to a new machine running Fedora 36, which has OpenSSL 3.0.0. This causes the SSL tests to fail on branches earlier than release 13, so I propose to backpatch commit f0d2c65f17 to the release 11 and 12 branches. This is not the

Re: OpenSSL 3.0.0 vs old branches

2023-02-06 Thread Tom Lane
Andrew Dunstan writes: > On 2023-02-06 Mo 11:13, Tom Lane wrote: >> So presumably, changing this test would break it for OpenSSL 0.9.8, >> which is still nominally supported in those branches. On the other >> hand, this test isn't run by default, so users would likely never >> notice anyway. >

Re: OpenSSL 3.0.0 vs old branches

2023-02-06 Thread Andrew Dunstan
On 2023-02-06 Mo 11:13, Tom Lane wrote: Andrew Dunstan writes: I recently moved crake to a new machine running Fedora 36, which has OpenSSL 3.0.0. This causes the SSL tests to fail on branches earlier than release 13, so I propose to backpatch commit f0d2c65f17 to the release 11 and 12

Re: OpenSSL 3.0.0 vs old branches

2023-02-06 Thread Tom Lane
Andrew Dunstan writes: > I recently moved crake to a new machine running Fedora 36, which has > OpenSSL 3.0.0. This causes the SSL tests to fail on branches earlier > than release 13, so I propose to backpatch commit f0d2c65f17 to the > release 11 and 12 branches. Hmm ... according to that

OpenSSL 3.0.0 vs old branches

2023-02-06 Thread Andrew Dunstan
I recently moved crake to a new machine running Fedora 36, which has OpenSSL 3.0.0. This causes the SSL tests to fail on branches earlier than release 13, so I propose to backpatch commit f0d2c65f17 to the release 11 and 12 branches. cheers andrew -- Andrew Dunstan