On 1 May 2018 at 21:04, Tom Lane wrote:
> I've pushed this patch into the 9.5 branch, so it should be possible to
> spin dory up on that branch now.
Thanks Tom!
Thanks everyone else for your input on the issue!
Regards, Haroon
--
Haroon
Stephen Frost writes:
> * Michael Paquier (mich...@paquier.xyz) wrote:
>> There is dory in the buildfarm which compiles using VS 2015, but it runs
>> only 9.6 and newer versions.
> That would be specifically because compiling 9.5 didn't work.. We'd be
> happy to have dory
Andrew Dunstan writes:
> Well, the commit suggests that we should be guided by what the buildfarm
> did, and then we never followed that up. I'd say in the light of
> experience we should backpatch it to the remaining live branches.
There are other VS2015 patches
On 04/26/2018 01:29 AM, Michael Paquier wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 26, 2018 at 09:06:09AM +0500, Haroon wrote:
>> Apparently the following patch[1] got committed to head only (9.6 at the
>> time) and never made it into back branches i.e. 9.5, 9.4 and 9.3. Is it an
>> oversight ?
>>
>> [1]
>>
Greetings,
* Michael Paquier (mich...@paquier.xyz) wrote:
> There is dory in the buildfarm which compiles using VS 2015, but it runs
> only 9.6 and newer versions.
That would be specifically because compiling 9.5 didn't work.. We'd be
happy to have dory running on older major versions, if
On Thu, Apr 26, 2018 at 09:06:09AM +0500, Haroon wrote:
> Apparently the following patch[1] got committed to head only (9.6 at the
> time) and never made it into back branches i.e. 9.5, 9.4 and 9.3. Is it an
> oversight ?
>
> [1]
>
Apparently the following patch[1] got committed to head only (9.6 at the
time) and never made it into back branches i.e. 9.5, 9.4 and 9.3. Is it an
oversight ?
[1]
http://git.postgresql.org/pg/commitdiff/868628e4fd44d75987d6c099ac63613cc5417629
Regards,
Haroon
--
Haroon