Re: Postgres Partitions Limitations (5.11.2.3)

2024-01-11 Thread Laurenz Albe
On Thu, 2024-01-11 at 14:44 +0100, Magnus Hagander wrote: > Thanks, applied and backpatched all the way. Thanks for taking care of that! Yours, Laurenz Albe

Re: Postgres Partitions Limitations (5.11.2.3)

2024-01-11 Thread Magnus Hagander
On Thu, Jan 11, 2024 at 11:24 AM Ashutosh Bapat wrote: > > On Wed, Jan 10, 2024 at 10:38 PM Laurenz Albe > wrote: > > > > On Wed, 2024-01-10 at 13:41 +0100, Magnus Hagander wrote: > > > It still reads a bit weird to me. How about the attached wording instead? > > > > Thanks! I am fine with

Re: Postgres Partitions Limitations (5.11.2.3)

2024-01-11 Thread Ashutosh Bapat
On Wed, Jan 10, 2024 at 10:38 PM Laurenz Albe wrote: > > On Wed, 2024-01-10 at 13:41 +0100, Magnus Hagander wrote: > > It still reads a bit weird to me. How about the attached wording instead? > > Thanks! I am fine with your wording. Works for me too. -- Best Wishes, Ashutosh Bapat

Re: Postgres Partitions Limitations (5.11.2.3)

2024-01-10 Thread Laurenz Albe
On Wed, 2024-01-10 at 13:41 +0100, Magnus Hagander wrote: > It still reads a bit weird to me. How about the attached wording instead? Thanks! I am fine with your wording. Yours, Laurenz Albe

Re: Postgres Partitions Limitations (5.11.2.3)

2024-01-10 Thread Magnus Hagander
On Tue, Dec 5, 2023 at 3:57 PM Ashutosh Bapat wrote: > > On Tue, Dec 5, 2023 at 1:40 AM Laurenz Albe wrote: > > > > On Fri, 2023-12-01 at 18:49 +0530, Ashutosh Bapat wrote: > > > On Thu, Nov 30, 2023 at 10:29 PM Laurenz Albe > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > On Thu, 2023-11-30 at 19:22 +0530,

Re: Postgres Partitions Limitations (5.11.2.3)

2023-12-05 Thread Ashutosh Bapat
On Tue, Dec 5, 2023 at 1:40 AM Laurenz Albe wrote: > > On Fri, 2023-12-01 at 18:49 +0530, Ashutosh Bapat wrote: > > On Thu, Nov 30, 2023 at 10:29 PM Laurenz Albe > > wrote: > > > > > > On Thu, 2023-11-30 at 19:22 +0530, Ashutosh Bapat wrote: > > > > May be attach the patch to hackers thread

Re: Postgres Partitions Limitations (5.11.2.3)

2023-12-04 Thread Laurenz Albe
On Fri, 2023-12-01 at 18:49 +0530, Ashutosh Bapat wrote: > On Thu, Nov 30, 2023 at 10:29 PM Laurenz Albe > wrote: > > > > On Thu, 2023-11-30 at 19:22 +0530, Ashutosh Bapat wrote: > > > May be attach the patch to hackers thread (this) as well? > > > > If you want, sure.  I thought it was good

Re: Postgres Partitions Limitations (5.11.2.3)

2023-12-01 Thread Ashutosh Bapat
On Thu, Nov 30, 2023 at 10:29 PM Laurenz Albe wrote: > > On Thu, 2023-11-30 at 19:22 +0530, Ashutosh Bapat wrote: > > May be attach the patch to hackers thread (this) as well? > > If you want, sure. I thought it was good enough if the thread > is accessible via the commitfest app. The addition

Re: Postgres Partitions Limitations (5.11.2.3)

2023-11-30 Thread Laurenz Albe
On Thu, 2023-11-30 at 19:22 +0530, Ashutosh Bapat wrote: > May be attach the patch to hackers thread (this) as well? If you want, sure. I thought it was good enough if the thread is accessible via the commitfest app. Yours, Laurenz Albe From ecdce740586e33eeb394d47564b10f813896ff11 Mon Sep 17

Re: Postgres Partitions Limitations (5.11.2.3)

2023-11-30 Thread Ashutosh Bapat
On Fri, Oct 27, 2023 at 12:28 PM Laurenz Albe wrote: > > On Mon, 2023-01-09 at 16:40 +0100, Laurenz Albe wrote: > > > "Using ONLY to add or drop a constraint on only the partitioned table is > > > supported as long as there are no partitions. Once partitions exist, using > > > ONLY will result in

Re: Postgres Partitions Limitations (5.11.2.3)

2023-11-29 Thread Shubham Khanna
On Thu, Nov 9, 2023 at 10:00 PM shihao zhong wrote: > > That looks good to me! > > The new status of this patch is: Ready for Committer I have reviewed the patch and it is working fine. Thanks and Regards, Shubham Khanna.

Re: Postgres Partitions Limitations (5.11.2.3)

2023-11-09 Thread shihao zhong
That looks good to me! The new status of this patch is: Ready for Committer

Re: Postgres Partitions Limitations (5.11.2.3)

2023-10-27 Thread Laurenz Albe
On Mon, 2023-01-09 at 16:40 +0100, Laurenz Albe wrote: > > "Using ONLY to add or drop a constraint on only the partitioned table is > > supported as long as there are no partitions. Once partitions exist, using > > ONLY will result in an error. Instead, constraints on the partitions > > themselves