On Sun, 20 Mar 2022 at 13:52, Andrew Dunstan wrote:
>
> On 3/19/22 14:48, Andres Freund wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > On 2022-03-03 13:37:35 +, Dave Page wrote:
> >> On Thu, 3 Mar 2022 at 13:28, Pavel Borisov
> wrote:
> >>
> >>> The mail system doesn't have the capability to apply different
>
>
> оf course we could get complaints no matter what level we set the limit
> at. I think raising it to 2Mb would be a reasonable experiment. If no
> observable evil ensues then leave it that way. If it does then roll it
> back. I agree that plain uncompressed patches are easier to deal with in
>
On 3/19/22 14:48, Andres Freund wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On 2022-03-03 13:37:35 +, Dave Page wrote:
>> On Thu, 3 Mar 2022 at 13:28, Pavel Borisov wrote:
>>
>>> The mail system doesn't have the capability to apply different moderation
rules for people in that way I'm afraid.
>>> Maybe then
Hi,
On 2022-03-03 13:37:35 +, Dave Page wrote:
> On Thu, 3 Mar 2022 at 13:28, Pavel Borisov wrote:
>
> > The mail system doesn't have the capability to apply different moderation
> >> rules for people in that way I'm afraid.
> >>
> > Maybe then 2MB for everyone? Otherwise it's not so
Greetings,
* Pavel Borisov (pashkin.e...@gmail.com) wrote:
> > On Thu, 3 Mar 2022 at 13:28, Pavel Borisov wrote:
> >> The mail system doesn't have the capability to apply different moderation
> >>> rules for people in that way I'm afraid.
> >>>
> >> Maybe then 2MB for everyone? Otherwise it's
Greetings,
* Aleksander Alekseev (aleksan...@timescale.com) wrote:
> My last email to pgsql-jobs@ was moderated in a similar fashion. To my
> knowledge that mailing list is not pre-moderated. So it may have the same
> problem, and not only with patches. (We use regular Google Workspace.)
-jobs
On Thu, Mar 03, 2022 at 10:17:06AM -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
> Pavel Borisov writes:
> >> The mail system doesn't have the capability to apply different moderation
> >> rules for people in that way I'm afraid.
>
> > Maybe then 2MB for everyone?
>
> Maybe your patch needs to be split up? You're
Pavel Borisov writes:
>> The mail system doesn't have the capability to apply different moderation
>> rules for people in that way I'm afraid.
> Maybe then 2MB for everyone?
Maybe your patch needs to be split up? You're going to have a hard time
finding people who want to review or commit such
Hi again,
> Any chance we could include the reason in the message? I foresee that
> otherwise such kinds of questions will be asked over and over again.
A link to the list of common reasons should work too.
--
Best regards,
Aleksander Alekseev
>
> On Thu, 3 Mar 2022 at 13:28, Pavel Borisov wrote:
>
>> The mail system doesn't have the capability to apply different moderation
>>> rules for people in that way I'm afraid.
>>>
>> Maybe then 2MB for everyone? Otherwise it's not so convenient. Lead to
>> answers before the questions in the
On Thu, Mar 03, 2022 at 01:37:35PM +, Dave Page wrote:
>
> Then someone will complain if their patch is 2.1MB! How often are messages
> legitimately over 1MB anyway, even with a patch? I don't usually moderate
> -hackers, so I don't know if this is a common thing or not.
It's not common, most
Hi Dave,
> Then someone will complain if their patch is 2.1MB! How often are messages
> legitimately over 1MB anyway, even with a patch? I don't usually moderate
> -hackers, so I don't know if this is a common thing or not.
>
> I'll ping a message across to the sysadmin team anyway; I can't
On Thu, 3 Mar 2022 at 13:28, Pavel Borisov wrote:
> The mail system doesn't have the capability to apply different moderation
>> rules for people in that way I'm afraid.
>>
> Maybe then 2MB for everyone? Otherwise it's not so convenient. Lead to
> answers before the questions in the thread [1],
>
> There's a FAQ link on the cfbot main page that answers this kind of
> questions.
>
Good to know! I'll try [.gz] next time then.
Thanks!
On Thu, Mar 03, 2022 at 04:24:03PM +0300, Aleksander Alekseev wrote:
>
> Thanks! Does anyone know if cfbot understands .patch.gz and/or .tgz ?
There's a FAQ link on the cfbot main page that answers this kind of questions.
>
> The mail system doesn't have the capability to apply different moderation
> rules for people in that way I'm afraid.
>
Maybe then 2MB for everyone? Otherwise it's not so convenient. Lead to
answers before the questions in the thread [1], seems weird.
[1]
On Thu, 3 Mar 2022 at 13:22, Pavel Borisov wrote:
> Message to list pgsql-hackers held for moderation due to 'Size 1MB
>> (1061796 bytes) is larger than threshold 1000KB (1024000 bytes)', notice
>> queued for 2 moderators
>>
> Could you make this limit 2MB at least for authorized commitfest
Hi Dave,
> Message to list pgsql-hackers held for moderation due to 'Size 1MB (1061796
> bytes) is larger than threshold 1000KB (1024000 bytes)', notice queued for 2
> moderators
Thanks! Does anyone know if cfbot understands .patch.gz and/or .tgz ?
--
Best regards,
Aleksander Alekseev
>
> Message to list pgsql-hackers held for moderation due to 'Size 1MB
> (1061796 bytes) is larger than threshold 1000KB (1024000 bytes)', notice
> queued for 2 moderators
>
Could you make this limit 2MB at least for authorized commitfest members?
Thanks!
--
Best regards,
Pavel Borisov
Postgres
Hi
On Thu, 3 Mar 2022 at 12:31, Pavel Borisov wrote:
> Hi, hackers!
>
> Around 2 months ago I've noticed a problem that messages containing
> patches in the thread [1] were always processed with manual moderation.
> They appear in hackers' thread hours after posting None of them are from
> new
Hi hackers,
> Confirm
Here are my two cents.
My last email to pgsql-jobs@ was moderated in a similar fashion. To my
knowledge that mailing list is not pre-moderated. So it may have the same
problem, and not only with patches. (We use regular Google Workspace.)
The pgsql-hackers@ thread under
On Thu, Mar 3, 2022 at 3:31 PM Pavel Borisov wrote:
> Hi, hackers!
>
> Around 2 months ago I've noticed a problem that messages containing
> patches in the thread [1] were always processed with manual moderation.
> They appear in hackers' thread hours after posting None of them are from
> new CF
Hi, hackers!
Around 2 months ago I've noticed a problem that messages containing patches
in the thread [1] were always processed with manual moderation. They appear
in hackers' thread hours after posting None of them are from new CF members
and personally, I don't see a reason for such
23 matches
Mail list logo
