On Thu, Dec 19, 2019 at 7:55 AM Tom Lane wrote:
> I don't think this is actually a good idea. What it is is a foot-gun,
> because if anyone adds code there that wants to access the special area
> of that particular page, it'll do the wrong thing, unless they remember
> to put back the assignment
De: Bruce Momjian
Enviado: quinta-feira, 19 de dezembro de 2019 16:19
>Oh, I was not aware that was boilerplate code. I agree it should be
>consistent, so patch reverted. Sorry.
I apologize to you, Bruce.
It is difficult to define where a "boilerplate" exists.
I agree that decent compiler, will
On Thu, Dec 19, 2019 at 10:55:42AM -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
> Bruce Momjian writes:
> > On Tue, Nov 26, 2019 at 01:45:10PM +, Ranier Vilela wrote:
> >> Same case on nbtpage.c at line 1637, with var opaque.
> >> make check, passed all 195 tests here with all commits.
>
> > You were right about b
Bruce Momjian writes:
> On Tue, Nov 26, 2019 at 01:45:10PM +, Ranier Vilela wrote:
>> Same case on nbtpage.c at line 1637, with var opaque.
>> make check, passed all 195 tests here with all commits.
> You were right about both of these, so removed in master. I am
> surprised no one else saw
On Tue, Nov 26, 2019 at 01:45:10PM +, Ranier Vilela wrote:
> Same case on nbtpage.c at line 1637, with var opaque.
> make check, passed all 195 tests here with all commits.
>
> Ranier Vilela
You were right about both of these, so removed in master. I am
surprised no one else saw this before.
Same case on nbtpage.c at line 1637, with var opaque.
make check, passed all 195 tests here with all commits.
Ranier Vileladiff --git a/src/backend/access/nbtree/nbtpage.c b/src/backend/access/nbtree/nbtpage.c
index 268f869a36..144fefccad 100644
--- a/src/backend/access/nbtree/nbtpage.c
+++ b/src/
