Stepan Neretin writes:
> However, I couldn’t find the patch or final diff in either the
> pgsql-committers message you linked or as an attachment in the original
> thread.
Commit is here:
https://git.postgresql.org/gitweb/?p=postgresql.git&a=commitdiff&h=3683af617
The "patch" link on such pages
On Mon, Jul 28, 2025 at 1:41 PM David G. Johnston <
david.g.johns...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Sunday, July 27, 2025, Stepan Neretin wrote:
>>
>> One small thing: it seems the commit or diff with the final adjustments
>> and test additions wasn't attached or linked in the thread. Could you
>> please
On Sunday, July 27, 2025, Stepan Neretin wrote:
>
> One small thing: it seems the commit or diff with the final adjustments
> and test additions wasn't attached or linked in the thread. Could you
> please point me to the commit hash or reference? I’d love to take a look at
> the final version.
>
On Sat, Jul 19, 2025 at 3:48 AM Tom Lane wrote:
> I wrote:
> > I'm inclined to accept 0001, reject 0002, and move on. This doesn't
> > seem like an area that's worth a huge amount of discussion.
>
> Done that way. I made a couple more cosmetic changes and added
> test cases for the double-backs
I wrote:
> I'm inclined to accept 0001, reject 0002, and move on. This doesn't
> seem like an area that's worth a huge amount of discussion.
Done that way. I made a couple more cosmetic changes and added
test cases for the double-backslash code path (which hadn't been
covered in byteaout either,
Peter Eisentraut writes:
> The relationship between patch 0001 and 0002 is unclear to me. Are
> these incremental or alternatives? The description doesn't make this clear.
It appears to me that 0002 is actually counterproductive. I cannot
see a reason to get a StringInfo involved here: it add
The relationship between patch 0001 and 0002 is unclear to me. Are
these incremental or alternatives? The description doesn't make this clear.
Some of the changes in patch 0002 just appear to move code and comments
around without changing anything substantial. It's not clear why that
is don
Hi Stepan,
> Sorry for the noise — I'm resending the patch because I noticed a compiler
> warning related to mixed declarations and code, which I’ve now fixed.
>
> Apologies for the oversight in the previous submission.
Thanks for the patch.
As Kirill pointed out above, it would be nice if you
On Fri, May 9, 2025 at 7:43 PM Aleksander Alekseev
wrote:
> Hi Stepan,
>
> > Sorry for the noise — I'm resending the patch because I noticed a
> compiler warning related to mixed declarations and code, which I’ve now
> fixed.
> >
> > Apologies for the oversight in the previous submission.
>
> Tha
On Fri, May 9, 2025 at 5:24 PM Stepan Neretin wrote:
>
>
> On Wed, Mar 26, 2025 at 9:39 PM Steven Niu wrote:
>
>>
>> 在 2025/3/26 16:37, Kirill Reshke 写道:
>> > On Wed, 26 Mar 2025 at 12:17, Steven Niu wrote:
>> >>
>> >> Hi,
>> >
>> > Hi!
>> >
>> >> This double scanning can be inefficient, especi
On Fri, May 9, 2025 at 5:37 PM Stepan Neretin wrote:
>
>
> On Fri, May 9, 2025 at 5:24 PM Stepan Neretin wrote:
>
>>
>>
>> On Wed, Mar 26, 2025 at 9:39 PM Steven Niu wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> 在 2025/3/26 16:37, Kirill Reshke 写道:
>>> > On Wed, 26 Mar 2025 at 12:17, Steven Niu wrote:
>>> >>
>>> >> Hi,
>
On Wed, Mar 26, 2025 at 9:39 PM Steven Niu wrote:
>
> 在 2025/3/26 16:37, Kirill Reshke 写道:
> > On Wed, 26 Mar 2025 at 12:17, Steven Niu wrote:
> >>
> >> Hi,
> >
> > Hi!
> >
> >> This double scanning can be inefficient, especially for large inputs.
> >> So I optimized the function to eliminate th
在 2025/3/26 16:37, Kirill Reshke 写道:
On Wed, 26 Mar 2025 at 12:17, Steven Niu wrote:
Hi,
Hi!
This double scanning can be inefficient, especially for large inputs.
So I optimized the function to eliminate the need for two scans,
while preserving correctness and efficiency.
While the arg
On Wed, 26 Mar 2025 at 12:17, Steven Niu wrote:
>
> Hi,
Hi!
> This double scanning can be inefficient, especially for large inputs.
> So I optimized the function to eliminate the need for two scans,
> while preserving correctness and efficiency.
While the argument that processing input once not
14 matches
Mail list logo
