On Thu, 1 Feb 2024 at 21:00, Tom Lane wrote:
>Note that the request is not itself flushed to the server
> automatically;
>use PQflush if necessary.
>
> Doesn't that require some rewording?
I agree that the current wording is slightly incorrect, but I think I
prefer we keep it
Alvaro Herrera writes:
> On 2023-Nov-07, Michael Paquier wrote:
>> Indeed, it looks a bit strange that there is no flush if the buffer
>> threshold is reached once the message is sent, so your suggestion
>> sounds right. Alvaro?
> Pushed, thanks.
I observe that this patch did not touch
On 2023-Nov-07, Michael Paquier wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 07, 2023 at 10:38:04AM +0100, Jelte Fennema-Nio wrote:
> > In pipeline mode after queuing a message to be sent we would flush the
> > buffer if the size of the buffer passed some threshold. The only message
> > type that we didn't do that for
On Tue, Nov 07, 2023 at 12:43:18PM +0100, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
> I agree, and I intend to get this patch pushed once the release freeze
> is lifted.
Thanks!
--
Michael
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
On 2023-Nov-07, Michael Paquier wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 07, 2023 at 10:38:04AM +0100, Jelte Fennema-Nio wrote:
> > In pipeline mode after queuing a message to be sent we would flush the
> > buffer if the size of the buffer passed some threshold. The only message
> > type that we didn't do that for
On Tue, Nov 07, 2023 at 10:38:04AM +0100, Jelte Fennema-Nio wrote:
> In pipeline mode after queuing a message to be sent we would flush the
> buffer if the size of the buffer passed some threshold. The only message
> type that we didn't do that for was the Flush message. This addresses
> that
