Re: Consistently use "startup process"/"WAL sender" instead of "Startup process"/"WAL Sender" in comments and docs.

2022-02-14 Thread John Naylor
On Mon, Feb 14, 2022 at 11:12 AM Bharath Rupireddy wrote: > > FWIW, docs need to hold to a higher standard than code comments. > > Thanks. In general, I agree that the docs and error/log messages > (user-facing) need to be of higher standard, but at the same time code > comments too IMHO. Because

Re: Consistently use "startup process"/"WAL sender" instead of "Startup process"/"WAL Sender" in comments and docs.

2022-02-13 Thread Bharath Rupireddy
On Sun, Feb 13, 2022 at 5:49 PM John Naylor wrote: > > On Sun, Feb 13, 2022 at 3:13 PM Bharath Rupireddy > wrote: > > > > Hi, > > > > In the code comments, it is being used as "Startup process" in the > > middle of the sentences whereas in most of the places "startup > > process" is used. Also, "

Re: Consistently use "startup process"/"WAL sender" instead of "Startup process"/"WAL Sender" in comments and docs.

2022-02-13 Thread John Naylor
On Sun, Feb 13, 2022 at 3:13 PM Bharath Rupireddy wrote: > > Hi, > > In the code comments, it is being used as "Startup process" in the > middle of the sentences whereas in most of the places "startup > process" is used. Also, "WAL Sender" is being used instead of "WAL > sender". Let's be consiste