> On Sep 23, 2025, at 04:02, David Rowley wrote:
>
> On Mon, 22 Sept 2025 at 14:46, Chao Li wrote:
>> diff --git a/src/backend/rewrite/rowsecurity.c
>> b/src/backend/rewrite/rowsecurity.c
>
>> - * rewrite/rowsecurity.c
>> + * rowsecurity.c
>
>> + *
>> + * IDENTIFICATION
>> + *src/backen
On Tue, 23 Sept 2025 at 10:21, Chao Li wrote:
> My script just scan all .c and .h files and extract one-line filename and
> file path from header comments. If they don’t equal to either pure filename
> or file path relative to repo root, then capture it. And rowsecurity.c was
> the only capture
On Mon, 22 Sept 2025 at 14:46, Chao Li wrote:
> diff --git a/src/backend/rewrite/rowsecurity.c
> b/src/backend/rewrite/rowsecurity.c
> - * rewrite/rowsecurity.c
> + * rowsecurity.c
> + *
> + * IDENTIFICATION
> + *src/backend/rewrite/rowsecurity.c
I don't what's incorrect with these as I'm
I quickly created a Python script and captured one more in
rewrite/rowsecurity.c. The file put filename reference in a different
format than other files:
```
diff --git a/src/backend/rewrite/rowsecurity.c
b/src/backend/rewrite/rowsecurity.c
index 4dad384d04d..3d6b6ba177b 100644
--- a/src/backend/r
On Mon, 22 Sept 2025 at 12:57, Richard Guo wrote:
>
> On Mon, Sep 22, 2025 at 9:53 AM David Rowley wrote:
> > I was just working on a script to find others and it highlighted a
> > bunch more. Do you still want to do this one, or should I take them
> > all in one fell swoop?
>
> Makes sense to ha
On Mon, Sep 22, 2025 at 9:53 AM David Rowley wrote:
> On Mon, 22 Sept 2025 at 11:59, Richard Guo wrote:
> > On Mon, Sep 22, 2025 at 8:10 AM Chao Li wrote:
> > > When gin_tuple.h was introduced by commit 8492feb[1], the file header
> > > comment incorrectly referred to gin.h. Update the comment
On Mon, 22 Sept 2025 at 11:59, Richard Guo wrote:
>
> On Mon, Sep 22, 2025 at 8:10 AM Chao Li wrote:
> > When gin_tuple.h was introduced by commit 8492feb[1], the file header
> > comment incorrectly referred to gin.h. Update the comment to mention
> > gin_tuple.h instead.
>
> Indeed. Will push
On Mon, Sep 22, 2025 at 8:10 AM Chao Li wrote:
> When gin_tuple.h was introduced by commit 8492feb[1], the file header comment
> incorrectly referred to gin.h. Update the comment to mention gin_tuple.h
> instead.
Indeed. Will push the patch.
- Richard
