Re: LogicalChanges* and LogicalSubxact* wait events are never reported

2021-10-21 Thread Masahiro Ikeda
On 2021/10/21 17:40, Amit Kapila wrote: > On Wed, Oct 20, 2021 at 3:46 PM Masahiro Ikeda > wrote: >> >> On 2021/10/20 18:17, Amit Kapila wrote: >>> On Wed, Oct 20, 2021 at 10:50 AM Michael Paquier >>> wrote: On Wed, Oct 20, 2021 at 02:12:20PM +0900, Masahiro Ikeda wrote: > If m

Re: LogicalChanges* and LogicalSubxact* wait events are never reported

2021-10-21 Thread Amit Kapila
On Wed, Oct 20, 2021 at 3:46 PM Masahiro Ikeda wrote: > > On 2021/10/20 18:17, Amit Kapila wrote: > > On Wed, Oct 20, 2021 at 10:50 AM Michael Paquier > > wrote: > >> > >> On Wed, Oct 20, 2021 at 02:12:20PM +0900, Masahiro Ikeda wrote: > >>> If my understanding is right, it's better to remove th

Re: LogicalChanges* and LogicalSubxact* wait events are never reported

2021-10-20 Thread Masahiro Ikeda
On 2021/10/20 18:17, Amit Kapila wrote: > On Wed, Oct 20, 2021 at 10:50 AM Michael Paquier wrote: >> >> On Wed, Oct 20, 2021 at 02:12:20PM +0900, Masahiro Ikeda wrote: >>> If my understanding is right, it's better to remove them since they make >>> users confused. Please see the attached patch.

Re: LogicalChanges* and LogicalSubxact* wait events are never reported

2021-10-20 Thread Amit Kapila
On Wed, Oct 20, 2021 at 10:50 AM Michael Paquier wrote: > > On Wed, Oct 20, 2021 at 02:12:20PM +0900, Masahiro Ikeda wrote: > > If my understanding is right, it's better to remove them since they make > > users confused. Please see the attached patch. I confirmed that to make > > check-world passe

Re: LogicalChanges* and LogicalSubxact* wait events are never reported

2021-10-19 Thread Michael Paquier
On Wed, Oct 20, 2021 at 02:12:20PM +0900, Masahiro Ikeda wrote: > If my understanding is right, it's better to remove them since they make > users confused. Please see the attached patch. I confirmed that to make > check-world passes all tests. Yeah, I don't see the point in keeping these events a