On 03.09.25 07:47, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
So, can we declare that we don't support this compiler anymore?
Ok, looks like we're calling it.
Here is a patch set to remove what turns out to be a significant amount
of code and documentation to support this compiler.
I also added in one tiny co
Peter Eisentraut writes:
> Here is a patch set to remove what turns out to be a significant amount
> of code and documentation to support this compiler.
Looks generally sane by eyeball -- I did not grep for anything that
you missed. I concur with Andres that tas.o is probably never going
to be
Hi,
Generally looks sane. A few minor remarks:
0003 leaves building of tas.o in place, but afaict there's nothing using the
infrastructure anymore - and it seems rather unlikely that we'll use it again.
0003 changes solaris support from "well-supported" to "supported" - that imo
seems independen
On 2025-09-03 07:47:37 +0200, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> So, can we declare that we don't support this compiler anymore?
+1
On Thu, Sep 4, 2025 at 2:42 AM Tom Lane wrote:
> Daniel Gustafsson writes:
> > On 3 Sep 2025, at 07:47, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> >> So, can we declare that we don't support this compiler anymore?
> >> (gcc is readily available and seems to work alright, so I'm not saying the
> >> OS is no long
On 03.09.25 13:42, Daniel Gustafsson wrote:
On 3 Sep 2025, at 07:47, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
- Hundreds of compiler warnings (They are not necessarily wrong, but it shows
that no one has taken care to tune the warnings or the code in any way
recently.)
Should these be posted somewhere bef
Daniel Gustafsson writes:
> On 3 Sep 2025, at 07:47, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
>> So, can we declare that we don't support this compiler anymore?
>> (gcc is readily available and seems to work alright, so I'm not saying the
>> OS is no longer viable.)
> +1 based on the findings above.
+1, given
> On 3 Sep 2025, at 07:47, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> - Hundreds of compiler warnings (They are not necessarily wrong, but it shows
> that no one has taken care to tune the warnings or the code in any way
> recently.)
Should these be posted somewhere before they are lost in case anyone is keen
On 2025-09-03 We 1:47 AM, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
I've been trying out the Solaris compiler (Oracle Developer Studio
12.6, on Solaris), mainly to test out some C11 support details.
Observations:
[ various issues]
I mean, at least the AIX enthusiasts popped up right away when we
broke t
