"David G. Johnston" writes:
> On Fri, May 25, 2018 at 3:33 PM, Tom Lane wrote:
>> Even if you'd made a case why we should consider them equal,
>> those would be very good reasons not to change behavior that's
>> stood for 17 years.
> This is true, and the alternative doesn't have the supporting
On Fri, May 25, 2018 at 3:33 PM, Tom Lane wrote:
> Alexey Bashtanov writes:
> > Comparison of timetz values looks a bit weird to me, as
> > '22:00+02'::timetz > '21:00+01'::timetz.
>
> Perhaps, but I don't think there's a reasonable case for considering
> them equal, either. In the other places
Alexey Bashtanov writes:
> Comparison of timetz values looks a bit weird to me, as
> '22:00+02'::timetz > '21:00+01'::timetz.
Perhaps, but I don't think there's a reasonable case for considering
them equal, either. In the other places where obviously-different
values compare equal, such as zero
