On Wed, Mar 12, 2025 at 10:52:57AM +, Bertrand Drouvot wrote:
> Note that it does not add extra explanation to "cost-based delay". If we feel
> the
> need we could add a link to " linkend="runtime-config-resource-vacuum-cost"/>"
> like it has been done for delay_time in bb8dff9995f.
Sorry for
Hi,
On Tue, Mar 04, 2025 at 03:24:26PM +, Bertrand Drouvot wrote:
> Like "more stats are always nice" I think that "more explanations in the doc"
> are
> always nice, so I don't see any reason why not to add this extra explanation.
Attached an attempt to do so.
Note that it does not add ext
Hi,
On Tue, Mar 04, 2025 at 08:54:13AM -0600, Nathan Bossart wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 04, 2025 at 03:12:18PM +0100, Magnus Hagander wrote:
> > In light of bb8dff9995f (add cost delay time to progress views), looking at
> > the output of 30a6ed0ce4b (track per-relation time spent on vacuum and
> > anal
On Tue, Mar 04, 2025 at 03:12:18PM +0100, Magnus Hagander wrote:
> In light of bb8dff9995f (add cost delay time to progress views), looking at
> the output of 30a6ed0ce4b (track per-relation time spent on vacuum and
> analyze), it struck me as a bit unclear of what the time is really showing.
>
>
