> On Oct 8, 2025, at 14:29, Peter Smith wrote:
>
> Perhaps that 2nd log was once supposed to say "created" (past tense),
> but even that seemed redundant.
>
> Here is a small patch to remove the log duplication by keeping only
> the log *within* the function.
>
> Thoughts?
>
> ==
> Kind
On Thu, Oct 09, 2025 at 01:36:36PM +1100, Peter Smith wrote:
> Thanks.
Done this one.
--
Michael
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
On Thu, Oct 9, 2025 at 1:31 PM Chao Li wrote:
>
>
>
> On Oct 8, 2025, at 14:29, Peter Smith wrote:
>
> Perhaps that 2nd log was once supposed to say "created" (past tense),
> but even that seemed redundant.
>
> Here is a small patch to remove the log duplication by keeping only
> the log *within*
On Thu, Oct 9, 2025 at 4:03 PM Michael Paquier wrote:
>
> On Thu, Oct 09, 2025 at 01:36:36PM +1100, Peter Smith wrote:
> > Thanks.
>
> Done this one.
> --
Thanks for pushing!
==
Kind Regards,
Peter Smith.
Fujitsu Australia
On Wed, Oct 08, 2025 at 05:29:20PM +1100, Peter Smith wrote:
> It didn't look right to me.
>
> I found the code is doing:
> - pg_log_info("creating the replication slot unconditional inside
> create_logical_replication_slot
> - pg_log_info("create replication slot...") immediately after call to
>
