On Tue, Jul 08, 2025 at 05:40:39PM +0300, Florents Tselai wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 1, 2025 at 12:25 PM Peter Eisentraut wrote:
>>> +
>>> +Below are some checklists for common scenarios.
>>> +
>>> +## Adding a New Built-in SQL Command
>>> +
>>> +1. Implement the function in C and place it in the approp
On Tue, Jul 1, 2025 at 12:25 PM Peter Eisentraut
wrote:
> On 24.05.25 12:34, Florents Tselai wrote:
> >
> >
> >> On 24 May 2025, at 12:24 PM, Álvaro Herrera
> wrote:
> >>
> >> On 2025-May-24, Florents Tselai wrote:
> >>
> >>> I aggree with having more READMEs around the src tree.
> >>> It’s true
On 24.05.25 12:34, Florents Tselai wrote:
On 24 May 2025, at 12:24 PM, Álvaro Herrera wrote:
On 2025-May-24, Florents Tselai wrote:
I aggree with having more READMEs around the src tree.
It’s true that a lot of doc content found in VII. Internals is dev-oriented,
but imho it should be clos
> On 24 May 2025, at 12:24 PM, Álvaro Herrera wrote:
>
> On 2025-May-24, Florents Tselai wrote:
>
>> I aggree with having more READMEs around the src tree.
>> It’s true that a lot of doc content found in VII. Internals is dev-oriented,
>> but imho it should be closer to the src (and more succi
On 2025-May-24, Florents Tselai wrote:
> I aggree with having more READMEs around the src tree.
> It’s true that a lot of doc content found in VII. Internals is dev-oriented,
> but imho it should be closer to the src (and more succinct/less verbose too).
Maybe these READMEs can simply contain lit
>
> This stuff is already documented in bki.sgml. Adding an extra
> location to hint about the script may be useful to have, but
> pg_proc.dat is not a good choice as it is one catalog among many
> others. One idea: we could add a README or a README.oid in
> src/include/catalog/ telling more a
On Fri, May 23, 2025 at 07:03:31PM +0300, Florents Tselai wrote:
> -
For the sake of the archives: this has been mentioned on Discord.
+++ b/src/include/catalog/pg_proc.dat
+# To find unused OIDs see src/include/catalog/unused_oids.
+# If multiple related OIDs are added, it is suggested they're c
