On Fri, Jul 28, 2023 at 04:54:56PM +0900, Michael Paquier wrote:
> I am finishing with the attached. Thoughts?
Applied this one as bf22792 on HEAD, without a backpatch as in-place
tablespaces are around for developers. If there are opinions in favor
of a backpatch, feel free of course.
--
Michae
On Tue, Jul 25, 2023 at 04:36:42PM +0900, Michael Paquier wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 19, 2023 at 09:31:35PM +0800, 赵锐(惜元) wrote:
>> To help reproduce the failure, I have attached a tap test. And I am
>> pleased to say that I have also identified a solution for this
>> problem, which I have included in
On Wed, Jul 19, 2023 at 09:31:35PM +0800, 赵锐(惜元) wrote:
> Recently I encountered an issue: pg_rewind fails when dealing with
> in-place tablespace. The problem seems to be that pg_rewind is
> treating in-place tablespace as symbolic link, while in fact it
> should be treated as directory.
> H
