Re: Refactoring the regression tests for more independence

2022-07-23 Thread Aleksander Alekseev
Hi Tom, > FWIW, I tried to replicate this locally on my own RPi3B+, using > current Ubuntu 20.04.4 LTS (GNU/Linux 5.4.0-1066-raspi aarch64). > No luck: it all works fine for me. We have at least one Raspbian > buildfarm animal too, and it's not been unhappy either. I suspect > there is

Re: Refactoring the regression tests for more independence

2022-07-22 Thread Tom Lane
Aleksander Alekseev writes: > Sorry about the confusion regarding the environment differences. GCC > version is 8.3.0, Perl 5.28.1. All in all this is pretty much the > default Raspbian 10 environment, something you would typically get > after setting up your RPi 3 B+ using Raspberry Pi Imager

Re: Refactoring the regression tests for more independence

2022-07-22 Thread Aleksander Alekseev
Hi Tom, > Since you haven't explained what's different about this environment, > it's hard to comment on these results. But is this really a stock > Postgres source tree, with no local modifications? The fragment of > src/test/regress/expected/copy.out that you show does not look > current.

Re: Refactoring the regression tests for more independence

2022-07-22 Thread Tom Lane
Aleksander Alekseev writes: > I wanted to test one of the patches we have for the July CF on the > Raspberry Pi 3 Model B+. It runs Raspbian GNU/Linux 10 (buster) and > Linux Kernel 5.10.60-v7+. > I discovered that the PostgreSQL tests don't pass in this environment. Since you haven't explained

Re: Refactoring the regression tests for more independence

2022-02-08 Thread Tom Lane
Julien Rouhaud writes: > On Mon, Feb 07, 2022 at 02:00:25PM -0500, Tom Lane wrote: >> Not too surprisingly, these patches broke during the commitfest. >> Here's a rebased version. >> I'm not sure that anyone wants to review these in detail ... >> should I just go ahead and push them? > I don't

Re: Refactoring the regression tests for more independence

2022-02-07 Thread Julien Rouhaud
On Mon, Feb 07, 2022 at 02:00:25PM -0500, Tom Lane wrote: > Not too surprisingly, these patches broke during the commitfest. > Here's a rebased version. > > I'm not sure that anyone wants to review these in detail ... > should I just go ahead and push them? I don't see anything shocking after a

Re: Refactoring the regression tests for more independence

2022-01-02 Thread Justin Pryzby
On Fri, Dec 24, 2021 at 05:00:17PM -0500, Tom Lane wrote: > While I've not done so here, I'm tempted to rename > create_function_0 to create_function_c and create_function_3 to > create_function_sql, to give them better-defined charters and > eliminate the confusion with trailing digits for