On Tue, May 2, 2023 at 10:18 PM David Rowley wrote:
> I don't really agree that one is any more correct than the other. I
> also don't think we should be making changes like this as doing this
> may give some false impression that we have some standard to follow
> here that a local variable of a g
On Wed, 3 May 2023 at 12:16, Yaphters W wrote:
> I just found the naming of the ItemId variables is not consistent in
> heapam.c. There are 13 'lpp's and 112 'lp's. Technically 'lpp' is correct as
> ItemId is a line pointer's pointer and there used to be code like "++lpp" for
> line pointer arr
Hi,
I just found the naming of the ItemId variables is not consistent in
heapam.c. There are 13 'lpp's and 112 'lp's. Technically 'lpp' is correct
as ItemId is a line pointer's pointer and there used to be code like
"++lpp" for line pointer array iteration. Now that all the "++lpp" code has
been r
