On Thu, Aug 19, 2021 at 10:04 PM Andrey Borodin
wrote:
> I just want to note, that on your screenshot unpatched version runs 400K
> tps, while patched runs 280K tps. I see the dates are different and this
> effect is not observed in [0]. Probably, you run tests on different
> machines.
Indeed,
> 20 авг. 2021 г., в 09:45, Nikolay Samokhvalov написал(а):
>
> The patches changing the SLRU algorithm and adding GUCs to control the buffer
> sizes look really promising. Optimization in this area would really help
> those who use SAVEPOINTs. I suspect, we have a lot of such users – ORMs l
