On Fri, Sep 04, 2020 at 10:15:57AM +0900, Michael Paquier wrote:
> Thanks, fixed.
With the two comment fixes included, I have looked at both patches
again today, and applied them.
--
Michael
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
On Thu, Sep 03, 2020 at 10:50:49AM -0400, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
> I'm not sure you need the second sentence in this comment; keeping the
> "delay initialization until ..." part seems sufficient. If you really
> want to highlight that initialization is costly, maybe just say "delay
> costly
I agree, this version looks much better, thanks. Two very minor things:
On 2020-Sep-03, Michael Paquier wrote:
> @@ -76,11 +77,23 @@ recordMultipleDependencies(const ObjectAddress *depender,
>
> dependDesc = table_open(DependRelationId, RowExclusiveLock);
>
> + /*
> + *
> On 3 Sep 2020, at 12:19, Michael Paquier wrote:
>
> On Thu, Sep 03, 2020 at 09:47:07AM +0200, Daniel Gustafsson wrote:
>> I think this version is a clear improvement. Nothing more sticks out from a
>> read-through.
>
> Thanks for taking the time to look at it, Daniel. We of course could
>
On Thu, Sep 03, 2020 at 09:47:07AM +0200, Daniel Gustafsson wrote:
> I think this version is a clear improvement. Nothing more sticks out from a
> read-through.
Thanks for taking the time to look at it, Daniel. We of course could
still try to figure out how we could group all dependencies
> On 3 Sep 2020, at 07:35, Michael Paquier wrote:
>
> On Tue, Sep 01, 2020 at 11:53:36AM +0200, Daniel Gustafsson wrote:
>> On 14 Aug 2020, at 20:23, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
>>
>>> The logic to keep track number of used slots used is baroque, though -- that
>>> could use a lot of simplification.
On Tue, Sep 01, 2020 at 11:53:36AM +0200, Daniel Gustafsson wrote:
> On 14 Aug 2020, at 20:23, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
>
>> The logic to keep track number of used slots used is baroque, though -- that
>> could use a lot of simplification.
>
> What if slot_init was an integer which increments
> On 14 Aug 2020, at 20:23, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
> The logic to keep track number of used slots used is baroque, though -- that
> could use a lot of simplification.
What if slot_init was an integer which increments together with the loop
variable until max_slots is reached? If so, maybe it
On Sat, Aug 15, 2020 at 10:50:37AM +0900, Michael Paquier wrote:
> What are you suggesting here? A new API layer to manage a set of
> slots?
It has been a couple of weeks, and I am not really sure what is the
suggestion here. So I would like to move on with this patch set as
the changes are
On Fri, Aug 14, 2020 at 02:23:16PM -0400, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
> It seems a bit silly to worry about allocating just the exact amount
> needed; the current approach looked fine to me.
Okay, thanks.
> The logic to keep track
> number of used slots used is baroque, though -- that could use a lot
On 2020-Aug-14, Michael Paquier wrote:
> Regarding the maximum number of slots allocated. Do people like the
> current approach taken by the patch to do a single loop of the
> dependency entries at the cost of more allocating perhaps too much for
> the array holding the set of TupleTableSlots
On Thu, Aug 13, 2020 at 11:45:52AM -0400, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
> MAX_CATALOG_INSERT_BYTES sounds decent to me. I mentioned dependency.h
> because I was uncaffeinatedly thinking that this was used with API
> defined there -- but in reality it's used with indexing.h functions, and
> it seems to me
On 2020-Aug-13, Michael Paquier wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 13, 2020 at 05:35:14AM -0400, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
> > Next to the API definition I guess, is that dependency.h?
>
> We need something more central, see also MAX_PGATTRIBUTE_INSERT_BYTES
> and MAX_PGSHDEPEND_INSERT_BYTES. And the definition
On Thu, Aug 13, 2020 at 05:35:14AM -0400, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
> Next to the API definition I guess, is that dependency.h?
We need something more central, see also MAX_PGATTRIBUTE_INSERT_BYTES
and MAX_PGSHDEPEND_INSERT_BYTES. And the definition should be named
something like
On 2020-Aug-13, Michael Paquier wrote:
> Okay. Would src/include/catalog/catalog.h be a suited location for
> this flag or somebody has a better idea?
Next to the API definition I guess, is that dependency.h?
--
Álvaro Herrerahttps://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL
On Wed, Aug 12, 2020 at 07:52:42PM -0400, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
> Yeah. As I understand, the only reason to have this number is to avoid
> an arbitrarily large number of entries created as a single multi-insert
> WAL record ... but does that really ever happen? I guess if you create
> a table
On 2020-Aug-11, Robert Haas wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 11, 2020 at 1:59 AM Michael Paquier wrote:
> > On Mon, Aug 10, 2020 at 05:32:21PM -0700, Andres Freund wrote:
> > > Do we really want to end up with several separate defines for different
> > > type of catalog batch inserts? That doesn't seem like
On Tue, Aug 11, 2020 at 1:59 AM Michael Paquier wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 10, 2020 at 05:32:21PM -0700, Andres Freund wrote:
> > Do we really want to end up with several separate defines for different
> > type of catalog batch inserts? That doesn't seem like a good
> > thing. Think there should be a
On Mon, Aug 10, 2020 at 05:32:21PM -0700, Andres Freund wrote:
> Do we really want to end up with several separate defines for different
> type of catalog batch inserts? That doesn't seem like a good
> thing. Think there should be a single define for all catalog bulk
> inserts.
Unlikely so, but I
On Fri, Aug 07, 2020 at 03:16:19PM +0900, Michael Paquier wrote:
> I am adding this thread to the next commit fest. Thoughts are
> welcome.
Forgot to mention that this is based on some initial work from Daniel,
and that we have discussed the issue before I worked on it.
--
Michael
Hi all,
This is a continuation of the work that has been previously discussed
here, resulting mainly in e3931d0 for pg_attribute and pg_shdepend:
https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/20190213182737.mxn6hkdxwrzgx...@alap3.anarazel.de
I have been looking at the amount of work that could be done
21 matches
Mail list logo
