At Sat, 3 Mar 2018 09:46:11 -0500, Peter Eisentraut
wrote in
<7f1e5f2f-4902-2c29-de82-381de8cc6...@2ndquadrant.com>
> On 3/1/18 23:39, Michael Paquier wrote:
> > On Thu, Mar 01, 2018 at 02:27:13AM -0800, Andres Freund wrote:
> >> If I understand correctly there's been no progress on this since,
On 3/1/18 23:39, Michael Paquier wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 01, 2018 at 02:27:13AM -0800, Andres Freund wrote:
>> If I understand correctly there's been no progress on this since, and
>> there'd definitely need to be major work to get something we can agree
>> upon. Doesn't seem v11 material. I think we
On Thu, Mar 01, 2018 at 02:27:13AM -0800, Andres Freund wrote:
> If I understand correctly there's been no progress on this since, and
> there'd definitely need to be major work to get something we can agree
> upon. Doesn't seem v11 material. I think we should mark this as returned
> with feedback.
Hi,
On 2018-01-11 16:54:10 +0900, Kyotaro HORIGUCHI wrote:
> Thank you for the discussion.
If I understand correctly there's been no progress on this since, and
there'd definitely need to be major work to get something we can agree
upon. Doesn't seem v11 material. I think we should mark this as r
Thank you for the discussion.
# I didn't noticed that the license has been changed.
At Sat, 30 Dec 2017 14:35:27 -0500, Andrew Dunstan
wrote in
<4ab7546e-dd48-c985-2b26-e98d58920...@2ndquadrant.com>
>
>
> On 12/30/2017 10:45 AM, Tom Lane wrote:
> > Andrew Dunstan writes:
> >> As for out-dat
On 12/30/2017 10:45 AM, Tom Lane wrote:
> Andrew Dunstan writes:
>> As for out-dating, if we used DBD::PgPP we'd not be not in great danger
>> there - it doesn't appear to have changed for many years - latest
>> version is dated 2010. If we were to use it we'd have a dependency on
>> DBI, but th
Andrew Dunstan writes:
> As for out-dating, if we used DBD::PgPP we'd not be not in great danger
> there - it doesn't appear to have changed for many years - latest
> version is dated 2010. If we were to use it we'd have a dependency on
> DBI, but that in itself doesn't seem a great burden.
[ blo
On 12/29/2017 08:12 AM, Tels wrote:
> On Thu, December 28, 2017 10:14 pm, Tom Lane wrote:
>> Craig Ringer writes:
>>> Another option might be to teach the TAP infrastructure and the
>>> buildfarm
>>> client how to fetch cpanminus and build DBD::Pg against our build-tree,
>>> so
>>> we could use
On Thu, December 28, 2017 10:14 pm, Tom Lane wrote:
> Craig Ringer writes:
>> Another option might be to teach the TAP infrastructure and the
>> buildfarm
>> client how to fetch cpanminus and build DBD::Pg against our build-tree,
>> so
>> we could use Perl DBI.
>
> As a buildfarm owner, I'd take
Craig Ringer writes:
> Another option might be to teach the TAP infrastructure and the buildfarm
> client how to fetch cpanminus and build DBD::Pg against our build-tree, so
> we could use Perl DBI.
As a buildfarm owner, I'd take a *really* dim view of the buildfarm
trying to auto-fetch code off
On 28 December 2017 at 16:31, Kyotaro HORIGUCHI <
horiguchi.kyot...@lab.ntt.co.jp> wrote:
> Hello.
>
> It would be useful if we have interactive sessions for TAP
> tests. My first attempt was apparently unstable one that was
> using psql.
>
> https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/20170720.152533.
Hello.
It would be useful if we have interactive sessions for TAP
tests. My first attempt was apparently unstable one that was
using psql.
https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/20170720.152533.252230418.horiguchi.kyot...@lab.ntt.co.jp
Finally the test for the patch in the thread made not need s
12 matches
Mail list logo