On Mon, Feb 14, 2022 at 3:07 PM Heikki Linnakangas wrote:
>
> On 28/01/2022 12:10, Amul Sul wrote:
> > On Thu, Jan 27, 2022 at 12:01 PM Michael Paquier
> > wrote:
> >>
> >> After reading this patch and this thread, I have noticed that you are
> >> testing the same thing as Heikki here, patch
On 28/01/2022 12:10, Amul Sul wrote:
On Thu, Jan 27, 2022 at 12:01 PM Michael Paquier wrote:
After reading this patch and this thread, I have noticed that you are
testing the same thing as Heikki here, patch 0001:
On Thu, Jan 27, 2022 at 12:01 PM Michael Paquier wrote:
>
> On Thu, Jan 20, 2022 at 12:13:08PM +0530, Amul Sul wrote:
> > I found the cause for the test failing on window -- is due to the
> > custom archive command setting which wasn't setting the correct window
> > archive directory path.
>
>
At Thu, 27 Jan 2022 15:31:37 +0900, Michael Paquier wrote
in
> On Thu, Jan 20, 2022 at 12:13:08PM +0530, Amul Sul wrote:
> > I found the cause for the test failing on window -- is due to the
> > custom archive command setting which wasn't setting the correct window
> > archive directory path.
>
On Thu, Jan 20, 2022 at 12:13:08PM +0530, Amul Sul wrote:
> I found the cause for the test failing on window -- is due to the
> custom archive command setting which wasn't setting the correct window
> archive directory path.
After reading this patch and this thread, I have noticed that you are
On Tue, Jan 18, 2022 at 10:31 AM Kyotaro Horiguchi
wrote:
>
> At Tue, 18 Jan 2022 12:25:15 +0800, Julien Rouhaud wrote
> in
> > Hi,
> >
> > On Mon, Jan 17, 2022 at 09:33:57PM +0800, Julien Rouhaud wrote:
> > >
> > > Thanks for the updated patch! Note that thanks to Andres and Thomas
> > >
At Tue, 18 Jan 2022 12:25:15 +0800, Julien Rouhaud wrote
in
> Hi,
>
> On Mon, Jan 17, 2022 at 09:33:57PM +0800, Julien Rouhaud wrote:
> >
> > Thanks for the updated patch! Note that thanks to Andres and Thomas work,
> > you
> > can now easily rely on the exact same CI than the cfbot on your
Hi,
On Mon, Jan 17, 2022 at 09:33:57PM +0800, Julien Rouhaud wrote:
>
> Thanks for the updated patch! Note that thanks to Andres and Thomas work, you
> can now easily rely on the exact same CI than the cfbot on your own github
> repository, if you need to debug something on a platform you don't
Hi,
On Mon, Jan 17, 2022 at 05:07:48PM +0530, Amul Sul wrote:
>
> I am not sure what really went wrong but I think the 'standby_9'
> server shutdown too early before it gets a chance to archive a
> required WAL file. The attached patch tries to shutdown that server
> after the required WAL are
On Sat, Jan 15, 2022 at 11:35 AM Julien Rouhaud wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> On Mon, Jan 10, 2022 at 09:46:23AM +0530, Amul Sul wrote:
> >
> > Thanks for the note, I can see the same test is failing on my centos
> > vm too with the latest master head(376ce3e404b). The failing reason is
> > the
Hi,
On Mon, Jan 10, 2022 at 09:46:23AM +0530, Amul Sul wrote:
>
> Thanks for the note, I can see the same test is failing on my centos
> vm too with the latest master head(376ce3e404b). The failing reason is
> the "recovery_target_inclusive = off" setting which is unnecessary for
> this test,
On Mon, Jan 10, 2022 at 8:25 AM Andres Freund wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> On 2021-11-23 11:43:21 +0530, Amul Sul wrote:
> > Attached patch covers a case where TLI in the filename for a
> > record being read is different from where it belongs to. In other
> > words, it covers following case noted in
Hi,
On 2021-11-23 11:43:21 +0530, Amul Sul wrote:
> Attached patch covers a case where TLI in the filename for a
> record being read is different from where it belongs to. In other
> words, it covers following case noted in StartupXLOG():
> Thoughts? Suggestions?
It seems the test isn't quite
Hi,
Attached patch covers a case where TLI in the filename for a
record being read is different from where it belongs to. In other
words, it covers following case noted in StartupXLOG():
/*
* EndOfLogTLI is the TLI in the filename of the XLOG segment containing
* the end-of-log. It could be
14 matches
Mail list logo
