Re: Test mail for pgsql-hackers

2025-05-13 Thread Andres Freund
On 2025-03-12 15:56:08 +0530, Ashutosh Bapat wrote: > Large part of your patch is renaming files which are not related to > this patch. Can you please clean that up. Since this has not been fixed, and the patch has not passed CI since at least mid March, I'll close this CF entry.

Re: Test mail for pgsql-hackers

2025-03-12 Thread David G. Johnston
On Wednesday, March 12, 2025, Ashutosh Bapat wrote: > Hi Blessy, > > On Tue, Mar 11, 2025 at 6:03 PM BharatDB wrote: > >> > >> Hi , > > > > > >> > >> I’ve been exploring logical replication and noticed that if the column > datatypes don’t match between the publisher and subscriber, PostgreSQL >

Re: Test mail for pgsql-hackers

2025-03-12 Thread Ashutosh Bapat
Hi Blessy, On Tue, Mar 11, 2025 at 6:03 PM BharatDB wrote: >> >> Hi , > > >> >> I’ve been exploring logical replication and noticed that if the column >> datatypes don’t match between the publisher and subscriber, PostgreSQL >> doesn’t give a warning. This can cause unexpected behavior, and I t

Re: Test mail for pgsql-hackers

2025-03-11 Thread BharatDB
> > Hi , > I’ve been exploring logical replication and noticed that if the column > datatypes don’t match between the publisher and subscriber, PostgreSQL > doesn’t give a warning. This can cause unexpected behavior, and I thought > it might be helpful to alert users when this happens. > ###