On 25.07.22 14:04, Japin Li wrote:
Yeah, they do not have unique keys, however, here we check primary keys. So,
IMO, the description exceptions should say they do not have primary keys,
rather than do not have unique keys.
The context of that check is that for each system catalog we pick one
On Mon, 25 Jul 2022 at 19:39, Tom Lane wrote:
> Japin Li writes:
>> I found the misc_sanity has a SQL to check system catalogs that
>> do not have primary keys, however, in current exceptions it says
>> pg_depend, pg_shdepend don't have a unique key.
>
> As indeed they do not:
>
> regression=#
Japin Li writes:
> I found the misc_sanity has a SQL to check system catalogs that
> do not have primary keys, however, in current exceptions it says
> pg_depend, pg_shdepend don't have a unique key.
As indeed they do not:
regression=# \d pg_depend
Table "pg_catalog.pg_depend"
On Mon, Jul 25, 2022 at 1:24 PM Japin Li wrote:
>
>
> Hi, hackers
>
> I found the misc_sanity has a SQL to check system catalogs that
> do not have primary keys, however, in current exceptions it says
> pg_depend, pg_shdepend don't have a unique key.
>
> Should we fix it?
Indeed. There's a clear
Hi, hackers
I found the misc_sanity has a SQL to check system catalogs that
do not have primary keys, however, in current exceptions it says
pg_depend, pg_shdepend don't have a unique key.
Should we fix it?
--
Regrads,
Japin Li.
ChengDu WenWu Information Technology Co.,Ltd.
diff --git
