Re: Tom Lane 2019-09-28 <24917.1569692...@sss.pgh.pa.us>
> > (There's some extension modules
> > where the testsuite fails at a much higher rate, getting all targets
> > to pass at the same time is next to impossible there :(. )
>
> I feel your pain, believe me. Used to fight the same kind of pro
Christoph Berg writes:
> Re: Tom Lane 2019-09-26 <12685.1569510...@sss.pgh.pa.us>
>> We haven't seen it in quite some time in HEAD, though I fear that's
>> just due to bad luck or change of timing of unrelated tests.
> The v13 package builds that are running every 6h here haven't seen a
> problem
Re: Tom Lane 2019-09-26 <12685.1569510...@sss.pgh.pa.us>
> We haven't seen it in quite some time in HEAD, though I fear that's
> just due to bad luck or change of timing of unrelated tests.
The v13 package builds that are running every 6h here haven't seen a
problem yet either, so the probability
Christoph Berg writes:
> Building the 12rc1 package on Ubuntu eoan/amd64, I got this
> regression diff:
The append-order differences have been seen before, per this thread:
https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/flat/CA%2BhUKG%2B0CxrKRWRMf5ymN3gm%2BBECHna2B-q1w8onKBep4HasUw%40mail.gmail.com
We h
Building the 12rc1 package on Ubuntu eoan/amd64, I got this
regression diff:
12:06:27 diff -U3
/<>/build/../src/test/regress/expected/select_parallel.out
/<>/build/src/bin/pg_upgrade/tmp_check/regress/results/select_parallel.out
12:06:27 ---
/<>/build/../src/test/regress/expected/select_paralle
