On 21 November 2017 at 03:53, Tom Lane wrote:
> =?UTF-8?Q?Mart=c3=adn_Marqu=c3=a9s?= writes:
> > While following suggestions from Arthur Zakirov on a patch for
> > pg_basebackup I found that we are using isatty() in multiple places, but
> > we don't distinguish the WIN32 code which should use _i
=?UTF-8?Q?Mart=c3=adn_Marqu=c3=a9s?= writes:
> While following suggestions from Arthur Zakirov on a patch for
> pg_basebackup I found that we are using isatty() in multiple places, but
> we don't distinguish the WIN32 code which should use _isatty() as per [1].
I dunno, [1] looks like pure pedant
Hi,
While following suggestions from Arthur Zakirov on a patch for
pg_basebackup I found that we are using isatty() in multiple places, but
we don't distinguish the WIN32 code which should use _isatty() as per [1].
It's true that isatty() is still supported by Visual C (else we'd fail
to compile)