On Wed, Jan 22, 2020 at 02:09:39PM +0900, Michael Paquier wrote:
On Tue, Jan 21, 2020 at 05:20:17PM +0100, Tomas Vondra wrote:
Yeah, you're right returning them with feedback seems more appropriate,
given the long inactivity. Plus, the CF app apparently does not allow
moving WoA patches to the n
On 2020-Jan-22, Michael Paquier wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 21, 2020 at 05:20:17PM +0100, Tomas Vondra wrote:
> > Those are the patches that have been set as WoA before this CF, and have
> > not been updated since. It's quite possible the state is stale for some
> > of those patches, although I've tried
On Tue, Jan 21, 2020 at 05:20:17PM +0100, Tomas Vondra wrote:
> Yeah, you're right returning them with feedback seems more appropriate,
> given the long inactivity. Plus, the CF app apparently does not allow
> moving WoA patches to the next CF anyway.
FWIW, I tend to take a base of two weeks as a
On Tue, Jan 21, 2020 at 12:25:14PM -0300, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
On 2020-Jan-21, Tomas Vondra wrote:
About half of the WoA patches are inactive for a long time, i.e. have
been marked like that before 2020-01 (and sometimes long before that)
and there have been no substantive updates. The chance
On 2020-Jan-21, Tomas Vondra wrote:
> About half of the WoA patches are inactive for a long time, i.e. have
> been marked like that before 2020-01 (and sometimes long before that)
> and there have been no substantive updates. The chance of that changing
> (i.e. getting a new patch version and a me
Hi,
We're about 10 days from the end of the 2020-01 CF. The current status
of the CF is this:
- Needs review: 118
- Waiting on Author: 42
- Ready for Committer: 10
- Committed: 36
- Moved to next CF: 3
- Returned with Feedback: 1
- Rejected: 3
- Withdrawn: 2
About half of the WoA patche
