Andres recently reminded me of some loose ends in archive modules [0], so
I'm starting a dedicated thread to address his feedback.
The first one is the requirement that archive module authors create their
own exception handlers if they want to make use of ERROR. Ideally, there
would be a handler
> On Nov 29, 2023, at 01:18, Nathan Bossart wrote:
>
> External Email
>
> Here is a new version of the patch with feedback addressed.
>
> --
> Nathan Bossart
> Amazon Web Services: https://aws.amazon.com
Hi Nathan,
The patch looks good to me. With the context explained in the thread, the
On Mon, Jan 15, 2024 at 12:21:44PM +, Li, Yong wrote:
> The patch looks good to me. With the context explained in the thread,
> the patch is easy to understand.
> The patch serves as a refactoring which pulls up common memory management
> and error handling concerns into the pgarch.c. With th
Here is a new version of the patch with feedback addressed.
--
Nathan Bossart
Amazon Web Services: https://aws.amazon.com
>From 3cda5bb87c82738ad6f8a082ef5dfeb49cd51392 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Nathan Bossart
Date: Tue, 28 Nov 2023 11:17:13 -0600
Subject: [PATCH v3 1/1] archiver exception
There seems to be no interest in this patch, so I plan to withdraw it from
the commitfest system by the end of the month unless such interest
materializes.
On Fri, Feb 17, 2023 at 01:56:24PM -0800, Nathan Bossart wrote:
> The first one is the requirement that archive module authors create their
>
Hi,
On 2023-11-13 16:42:31 -0600, Nathan Bossart wrote:
> There seems to be no interest in this patch, so I plan to withdraw it from
> the commitfest system by the end of the month unless such interest
> materializes.
I think it might just have arrived too shortly before the feature freeze to be
On Mon, Nov 13, 2023 at 03:35:28PM -0800, Andres Freund wrote:
> On 2023-11-13 16:42:31 -0600, Nathan Bossart wrote:
>> There seems to be no interest in this patch, so I plan to withdraw it from
>> the commitfest system by the end of the month unless such interest
>> materializes.
>
> I think it m
On Mon, Jan 15, 2024 at 08:50:25AM -0600, Nathan Bossart wrote:
> Thanks for reviewing. I've marked this as ready-for-committer, and I'm
> hoping to commit it in the near future.
This one probably ought to go into v17, but I wanted to do one last call
for feedback prior to committing.
--
Nathan
On Tue, Mar 26, 2024 at 02:14:14PM -0500, Nathan Bossart wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 15, 2024 at 08:50:25AM -0600, Nathan Bossart wrote:
>> Thanks for reviewing. I've marked this as ready-for-committer, and I'm
>> hoping to commit it in the near future.
>
> This one probably ought to go into v17, but I
