Re: btree_gist into core?

2023-12-14 Thread Julien Rouhaud
Hi, On Wed, Jan 19, 2022 at 09:30:11AM +0100, Peter Eisentraut wrote: > > To use exclusion constraints in practice, you often need to install the > btree_gist extension, so that you can combine for example a range type check > and normal scalar key columns into one constraint. > > [...] > > There

Re: btree_gist into core?

2023-12-14 Thread Emre Hasegeli
> Thoughts? I think it'd be really nice to do this without btree_gist. I imagine something like this: CREATE INDEX ON tbl USING gist ( range_col, int_col USING btree ) I think this would make the index access methods interface more useful. Index access method developers wouldn't need t

Re: btree_gist into core?

2022-01-24 Thread Tom Lane
Andreas Karlsson writes: > On 1/19/22 09:30, Peter Eisentraut wrote: >> I don't have a lot of experience with this module, so I don't know if >> there are any lingering concerns about whether it is mature enough as a >> built-in feature. > While it I like the idea on a conceptual level I worry

Re: btree_gist into core?

2022-01-24 Thread Andreas Karlsson
On 1/19/22 09:30, Peter Eisentraut wrote: So, first of all, would people agree with this course of action? I don't have a lot of experience with this module, so I don't know if there are any lingering concerns about whether it is mature enough as a built-in feature. While it I like the idea

btree_gist into core?

2022-01-19 Thread Peter Eisentraut
ilt-in SQL feature that relied on an extension to work at all. So I think the way forward would be to move btree_gist into core, and I'm starting this new thread here to give this topic a bit more attention. So, first of all, would people agree with this course of action? I don't have