Michael Paquier писал 2023-04-25 04:30:
On Mon, Apr 24, 2023 at 09:57:10AM +0900, Michael Paquier wrote:
The attached is what I am finishing with, with a minimal regression
test added to postgres_fdw. Two partitions are enough.
Well, I have gone through that again this morning, and applied th
On Mon, Apr 24, 2023 at 09:57:10AM +0900, Michael Paquier wrote:
> The attached is what I am finishing with, with a minimal regression
> test added to postgres_fdw. Two partitions are enough.
Well, I have gone through that again this morning, and applied the fix
down to 14. The buildfarm is dige
On Fri, Apr 21, 2023 at 07:16:03PM +0900, Michael Paquier wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 21, 2023 at 01:07:03PM +0300, Alexander Pyhalov wrote:
>> We've found that in cases like the one attached, when we insert into foreign
>> partition with batch_size set, buffer refcount leak is detected.
>>
>> The above
On Fri, Apr 21, 2023 at 01:07:03PM +0300, Alexander Pyhalov wrote:
> We've found that in cases like the one attached, when we insert into foreign
> partition with batch_size set, buffer refcount leak is detected.
>
> The above example we see a dozen of similar messages:
>
> repro_small.sql:31: WA
Hi.
We've found that in cases like the one attached, when we insert into
foreign partition with batch_size set, buffer refcount leak is detected.
The above example we see a dozen of similar messages:
repro_small.sql:31: WARNING: buffer refcount leak: [14621]
(rel=base/16718/16732, blockNum=
