On 2024-04-27 09:14, John Naylor wrote:
On Wed, Apr 17, 2024 at 7:21 AM John Naylor
wrote:
On Mon, Apr 15, 2024 at 9:20 PM Marina Polyakova
wrote:
> Everything seems to work with this patch, thank you!
Glad to hear it -- I'll push next week when I get back from vacation,
unless there are
On Wed, Apr 17, 2024 at 7:21 AM John Naylor wrote:
>
> On Mon, Apr 15, 2024 at 9:20 PM Marina Polyakova
> wrote:
> > Everything seems to work with this patch, thank you!
>
> Glad to hear it -- I'll push next week when I get back from vacation,
> unless there are objections.
Pushed, thanks for
On Mon, Apr 15, 2024 at 9:20 PM Marina Polyakova
wrote:
>
> On 2024-04-13 08:40, John Naylor wrote:
> > so that they build fine on PG16 as well. The problem is, not all the
> > required headers are generated when invoking `make headerscheck`. The
> > attached patch brings in some Makefile rules
On 2024-04-13 08:40, John Naylor wrote:
On Fri, Apr 12, 2024 at 11:51 PM Marina Polyakova
wrote:
...
In the other branches everything is fine: these problems begin with
commits [2] (jsonpath_gram.h) and [3] (gram.h) and in the master
branch
there're no such problems after commit [4]. The
On Fri, Apr 12, 2024 at 11:51 PM Marina Polyakova
wrote:
>
> Hello, hackers!
>
> When running cpluspluscheck/headerscheck on REL_16_STABLE [1] I found
> that everything was ok only if it was preceded by a build and make
> maintainer-clean was not used:
I can reproduce this.
> In the other
Hello, hackers!
When running cpluspluscheck/headerscheck on REL_16_STABLE [1] I found
that everything was ok only if it was preceded by a build and make
maintainer-clean was not used:
$ ./configure --without-icu --with-perl --with-python > configure.txt &&
make -j16 > make.txt &&
make -j16
