On Thu, Dec 21, 2017 at 12:55 PM, Andres Freund wrote:
> Had started written the email before finishing testing, forgot to fill
> in the blank. mutt annoyingly aborts with an empty subject, hence
> smashing one key a couple times.
Yeah, I figured that was what happened. It probably came across a
Hi,
On 2017-12-21 10:35:06 -0500, Robert Haas wrote:
> Great subject line!
Had started written the email before finishing testing, forgot to fill
in the blank. mutt annoyingly aborts with an empty subject, hence
smashing one key a couple times.
> On Thu, Dec 21, 2017 at 10:18 AM, Robert Haas w
On Thu, Dec 21, 2017 at 10:18 AM, Robert Haas wrote:
> If I run the regression tests with force_parallel_mode=on prior to the
> parallel hash join patch, they pass. If I run them now, they fail
> inside the parallel hash join tests here:
>
> create table wide as select generate_series(1, 2) as id
Great subject line!
On Thu, Dec 21, 2017 at 9:31 AM, Andres Freund wrote:
> I think both I and commit e9baa5e9fa147e are confused.
>
> By my reading this is the fault of e9baa5e9fa147e [3]. Robert, Haribabu
> any idea?
If I run the regression tests with force_parallel_mode=on prior to the
parall
Hi Robert, Todd, All,
I think both I and commit e9baa5e9fa147e are confused.
Mantid started to fail with the parallel hash join commit, with the following
assert failure [1]:
#2 0x008698e7 in ExceptionalCondition
(conditionName=conditionName@entry=0x8efee8
"!(CurrentTransactionState->p
