On Fri, May 23, 2025 at 10:52 AM David G. Johnston
wrote:
>
> On Thursday, May 22, 2025, Amit Kapila wrote:
>>
>> On Sat, May 3, 2025 at 9:33 PM David G. Johnston
>> wrote:
>> >
>> > While responding to a "our documentation is buggy" complaint I got annoyed
>> > in my attempt to reproduce the b
On Thursday, May 22, 2025, Amit Kapila wrote:
> On Sat, May 3, 2025 at 9:33 PM David G. Johnston
> wrote:
> >
> > While responding to a "our documentation is buggy" complaint I got
> annoyed in my attempt to reproduce the behavior by having to surgically
> copy line-by-line the DDL and DML code
On Sat, May 3, 2025 at 9:33 PM David G. Johnston
wrote:
>
> While responding to a "our documentation is buggy" complaint I got annoyed in
> my attempt to reproduce the behavior by having to surgically copy
> line-by-line the DDL and DML code involved. Let's strive for a more
> copy-paste frien
On Thu, May 15, 2025, 19:28 Peter Smith wrote:
>
>
> doesn't help bulk execution at all because the result gets in the way
> so you'll still end up surgically copying each SELECT. Since it fixes
> nothing I assumed you just commented the SELECT prompts for
> consistency with the other ones, right
On Sun, May 4, 2025 at 2:03 AM David G. Johnston
wrote:
>
> While responding to a "our documentation is buggy" complaint I got annoyed in
> my attempt to reproduce the behavior by having to surgically copy
> line-by-line the DDL and DML code involved. Let's strive for a more
> copy-paste frien
preferable.
David J.
From 6a21091d5ce058cb68ac23f49641e1db5069d5de Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: "David G. Johnston"
Date: Sat, 3 May 2025 08:41:47 -0700
Subject: [PATCH] doc: Make logical replication examples executable in bulk and
legal sgml.
The output command tags are not useful information for these exampl
