On Tue, Apr 11, 2023 at 1:48 PM Andres Freund wrote:
> Makes sense. Looks like there never was a flag defined for the sign bit,
> luckily. I assume you're just going to apply this for HEAD?
Yes.
I'm also going to rename the TransactionId field to "xmax", for
consistency with nearby very similar
Hi,
On 2023-04-11 13:13:49 -0700, Peter Geoghegan wrote:
> Commit 0ac5ad5134 ("Improve concurrency of foreign key locking") added
> infobits_set fields to certain WAL records. However, in the case of
> xl_heap_lock, it made the data type int8 rather than uint8.
>
> I believe that this was a minor
Commit 0ac5ad5134 ("Improve concurrency of foreign key locking") added
infobits_set fields to certain WAL records. However, in the case of
xl_heap_lock, it made the data type int8 rather than uint8.
I believe that this was a minor oversight. Attached patch fixes the issue.
--
Peter Geoghegan
