Jeff Janes writes:
> But the config.cache files gets deleted by make maintainer-clean. Doesn't
> that mostly defeat the purpose of having a cache? Am I doing something
> wrong here, or just thinking about it wrong?
Well, a few things about that:
(1) distclean *must* remove config.cache to be s
In side-note in another thread Tom pointed out the speed improvements of
using an autoconf cache when re-building, which sounded nice to me as
config takes an annoyingly long time and is not parallelized.
But the config.cache files gets deleted by make maintainer-clean. Doesn't
that mostly defeat
