Hi,
> Agreed. I've pushed your patch for that:
>
> > Here are corresponding patches.
>
> The ID is new in v17, so I also renamed it like
> s/installation-notes-visual/installation-notes-visual-studio/.
>
> (I didn't examine or push your other patch, which was about $SUBJECT.)
Thanks. Re-attachi
On Thu, May 30, 2024 at 01:32:18PM +0300, Aleksander Alekseev wrote:
> > > [*] What is the correct name for this?
> >
> > I believe in this section it should be "Visual Studio" as we specify
> > elsewhere [1][2]. In [2] we name specific required versions. Maybe we
> > should reference this section.
Hi
On Tue, 4 Jun 2024 at 17:36, Heikki Linnakangas wrote:
> On 04/06/2024 18:28, Dave Page wrote:
> > I clearly missed the discussion in which it was decided to remove the
> > old MSVC++ support from the tree (and am disappointed about that as I
> > would have objected loudly). Having recently s
On Tue, Jun 4, 2024 at 12:56 PM Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> Experimental is probably too harsh a word now.
>
> But it doesn't have feature parity with configure/make yet (for example,
> no .bc files), so I wouldn't recommend it for production or packaging
> builds.
That's unfortunate. :-(
> Then,
On 04.06.24 17:24, Robert Haas wrote:
On Wed, May 29, 2024 at 2:41 AM Peter Eisentraut wrote:
"Alternatively, PostgreSQL can be built using Meson. This is the only
option for building PostgreSQL in Windows using Visual Something[*].
For other platforms, using Meson is currently experimental."
On 04/06/2024 18:28, Dave Page wrote:
I clearly missed the discussion in which it was decided to remove the
old MSVC++ support from the tree (and am disappointed about that as I
would have objected loudly). Having recently started testing Meson on
Windows when I realised that change had been ma
On Tue, 4 Jun 2024 at 16:25, Robert Haas wrote:
> On Wed, May 29, 2024 at 2:41 AM Peter Eisentraut
> wrote:
> > "Alternatively, PostgreSQL can be built using Meson. This is the only
> > option for building PostgreSQL in Windows using Visual Something[*].
> > For other platforms, using Meson is
On Wed, May 29, 2024 at 2:41 AM Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> "Alternatively, PostgreSQL can be built using Meson. This is the only
> option for building PostgreSQL in Windows using Visual Something[*].
> For other platforms, using Meson is currently experimental."
Is it, though? I feel like we're b
Hi,
> VS should work, and if not, we should fix it. It's slow, so I'd not use it
> for scheduled builds, but for people developing using visual studio.
Since no one complained, should we assume that there are actually no
such people? If this is the case then VS arguably doesn't give any
value th
Hi,
On May 30, 2024 8:03:33 AM PDT, Andrew Dunstan wrote:
>On Thu, May 30, 2024 at 6:32 AM Aleksander Alekseev <
>aleksan...@timescale.com> wrote:
>
>>
>>
>> By a quick look on the buildfarm we seem to use Ninja >= 1.11.1.
>> However since Meson can use both Ninja and VS as a backend I'm not
>>
Hi,
>> By a quick look on the buildfarm we seem to use Ninja >= 1.11.1.
>> However since Meson can use both Ninja and VS as a backend I'm not
>> certain which section would be most appropriate for naming the minimal
>> required version of Ninja.
>
> When I tried building with the VS backend it ble
On Thu, May 30, 2024 at 6:32 AM Aleksander Alekseev <
aleksan...@timescale.com> wrote:
>
>
> By a quick look on the buildfarm we seem to use Ninja >= 1.11.1.
> However since Meson can use both Ninja and VS as a backend I'm not
> certain which section would be most appropriate for naming the minima
Hi,
> > [*] What is the correct name for this?
>
> I believe in this section it should be "Visual Studio" as we specify
> elsewhere [1][2]. In [2] we name specific required versions. Maybe we
> should reference this section.
>
> While on it, in [2] section 17.7.5 is named "Visual". I don't think
>
Hi.
> "Alternatively, PostgreSQL can be built using Meson. This is the only
> option for building PostgreSQL in Windows using Visual Something[*].
> For other platforms, using Meson is currently experimental."
+1 good catch
> [*] What is the correct name for this?
I believe in this section it
In installation.sgml it says
"""
Alternatively, PostgreSQL can be built using Meson. This is currently
experimental.
"""
Do we want to alter this statement for PG17, considering that this is
now the only way to build for Windows using MSVC?
(A joke response is that the Windows port itself
15 matches
Mail list logo
