Re: minor tweak to catalogs.sgml pg_class.reltablespace

2024-03-20 Thread Alvaro Herrera
On 2024-Mar-19, Tom Lane wrote: > The bit about "(Not meaningful if the relation has no on-disk file.)" > is not correct, and now it's adjacent to text that contradicts it. > Maybe more like > >The tablespace in which this relation is stored. >If zero, the database's default

Re: minor tweak to catalogs.sgml pg_class.reltablespace

2024-03-19 Thread Tom Lane
Alvaro Herrera writes: > While reviewing the patch for SET ACCESS METHOD[1] I noticed that > pg_class.relam is not documented fully for partitioned tables, so I > proposed the attached. The bit about "(Not meaningful if the relation has no on-disk file.)" is not correct, and now it's adjacent to

minor tweak to catalogs.sgml pg_class.reltablespace

2024-03-19 Thread Alvaro Herrera
While reviewing the patch for SET ACCESS METHOD[1] I noticed that pg_class.relam is not documented fully for partitioned tables, so I proposed the attached. Also, I remove a comment that merely repeats what was already said a few lines above. This is intended for backpatch to 12. [1]