Re: obsolete example

2019-11-22 Thread Michael Paquier
On Fri, Nov 22, 2019 at 06:11:32AM +0100, Pavel Stehule wrote: > +1 Okay, done. I have added a .gitignore while on it in the path for the files generated. -- Michael signature.asc Description: PGP signature

Re: obsolete example

2019-11-21 Thread Pavel Stehule
pá 22. 11. 2019 v 1:13 odesílatel Michael Paquier napsal: > On Thu, Nov 21, 2019 at 08:19:56PM -0300, Euler Taveira wrote: > > Em qui., 21 de nov. de 2019 às 15:59, Pavel Stehule > > escreveu: > >> > >> isn't src/tutorial/func.c obsolete? There is not any benefit for users. > > > > version-0

Re: obsolete example

2019-11-21 Thread Tom Lane
Michael Paquier writes: > No objections from here, let's get rid of it. The docs actually make > use of the V1 versions, and funcs_new.c is not even compiled (it does > compile). Any objections to the attached? On top of moving the file, > there is one comment to update and a sentence to

Re: obsolete example

2019-11-21 Thread Michael Paquier
On Thu, Nov 21, 2019 at 08:19:56PM -0300, Euler Taveira wrote: > Em qui., 21 de nov. de 2019 às 15:59, Pavel Stehule > escreveu: >> >> isn't src/tutorial/func.c obsolete? There is not any benefit for users. > > version-0 calling conventions were removed in v10. It seems an > oversight at commit

Re: obsolete example

2019-11-21 Thread Euler Taveira
Em qui., 21 de nov. de 2019 às 15:59, Pavel Stehule escreveu: > > isn't src/tutorial/func.c obsolete? There is not any benefit for users. > version-0 calling conventions were removed in v10. It seems an oversight at commit 5ded4bd2140. Tutorial needs some care (I'm not volunteering to improve

obsolete example

2019-11-21 Thread Pavel Stehule
Hi isn't src/tutorial/func.c obsolete? There is not any benefit for users. Regards Pavel