It was never put into the build, and I have a PR open to remove the LLD_UNSAFE
flag for 10.5 and the rest of today's releases.
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=229523
--
Larry Rosenman http://www.lerctr.org/~ler
Phone: +1 214-642-9640 E-Mail
On 2018-Jul-09, Larry Rosenman wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 09, 2018 at 05:25:50PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> > I wrote:
> > > I'd been hesitant to back-patch dddfc4cb2 back in April; but now that
> > > it's survived some beta testing, I think that doing so seems like the
> > > most appropriate way to fix t
On Mon, Jul 09, 2018 at 05:25:50PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> I wrote:
> > I'd been hesitant to back-patch dddfc4cb2 back in April; but now that
> > it's survived some beta testing, I think that doing so seems like the
> > most appropriate way to fix this.
>
> Done. Hopefully I didn't break anythin
I wrote:
> I'd been hesitant to back-patch dddfc4cb2 back in April; but now that
> it's survived some beta testing, I think that doing so seems like the
> most appropriate way to fix this.
Done. Hopefully I didn't break anything; a lot of this code has mutated
to some extent since 9.3. But I exp
I wrote:
> Huh. So what that suggests is that the problem is related to picking
> up copies of our libraries from outside the build tree. Do you have
> any copies of libpgport.a/.so or libpgcommon.a/.so in
> /usr/local/lib or /usr/lib or /lib ?
Ah, no, scratch that, I see the problem. In v10, p
On Sat, Jul 07, 2018 at 01:33:26PM -0500, Larry Rosenman wrote:
> On Sat, Jul 07, 2018 at 02:28:17PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> > Larry Rosenman writes:
> > > And the winner is:
> >
> > > dddfc4cb2edcfa5497f5d50190a7fb046c51da16 is the first bad commit
> > > commit dddfc4cb2edcfa5497f5d50190a7fb046
On Sat, Jul 07, 2018 at 02:28:17PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> Larry Rosenman writes:
> > And the winner is:
>
> > dddfc4cb2edcfa5497f5d50190a7fb046c51da16 is the first bad commit
> > commit dddfc4cb2edcfa5497f5d50190a7fb046c51da16
> > Author: Tom Lane
> > Date: Tue Apr 3 16:26:05 2018 -0400
> >
Larry Rosenman writes:
> And the winner is:
> dddfc4cb2edcfa5497f5d50190a7fb046c51da16 is the first bad commit
> commit dddfc4cb2edcfa5497f5d50190a7fb046c51da16
> Author: Tom Lane
> Date: Tue Apr 3 16:26:05 2018 -0400
>
> Prevent accidental linking of system-supplied copies of libpq.so etc
On Sat, Jul 07, 2018 at 11:24:48AM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> Larry Rosenman writes:
> > On Sat, Jul 07, 2018 at 11:11:24AM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> >> Larry Rosenman writes:
> >>> f044d71e331d77a0039cec0a11859b5a3c72bc95 fixed it.
>
> >> Don't think I believe that conclusion; that patch shouldn't
Larry Rosenman writes:
> On Sat, Jul 07, 2018 at 11:11:24AM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
>> Larry Rosenman writes:
>>> f044d71e331d77a0039cec0a11859b5a3c72bc95 fixed it.
>> Don't think I believe that conclusion; that patch shouldn't
>> have affected anything at all for non-ARM architectures.
> Those
On Sat, Jul 07, 2018 at 11:11:24AM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> Larry Rosenman writes:
> > f044d71e331d77a0039cec0a11859b5a3c72bc95 fixed it.
>
> Don't think I believe that conclusion; that patch shouldn't
> have affected anything at all for non-ARM architectures.
>
> regards,
Larry Rosenman writes:
> f044d71e331d77a0039cec0a11859b5a3c72bc95 fixed it.
Don't think I believe that conclusion; that patch shouldn't
have affected anything at all for non-ARM architectures.
regards, tom lane
On Fri, Jul 06, 2018 at 07:18:46PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> Larry Rosenman writes:
> > On Fri, Jul 06, 2018 at 06:40:49PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> >> I do not like the "-Wl,-z,notext" thing at all. It fails to explain
> >> why things are working OK in v11/HEAD, which makes me think that it's
> >>
Larry Rosenman writes:
> On Fri, Jul 06, 2018 at 06:40:49PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
>> I do not like the "-Wl,-z,notext" thing at all. It fails to explain
>> why things are working OK in v11/HEAD, which makes me think that it's
>> band-aiding something rather than really fixing it.
> Following th
On Fri, Jul 06, 2018 at 06:05:36PM -0500, Larry Rosenman wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 06, 2018 at 06:40:49PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> > Larry Rosenman writes:
> > > anyone want to look at this, or at least give me a clue on how to add
> > > this to 10 & below?
> >
> > I do not like the "-Wl,-z,notext" th
On Fri, Jul 06, 2018 at 06:40:49PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> Larry Rosenman writes:
> > anyone want to look at this, or at least give me a clue on how to add
> > this to 10 & below?
>
> I do not like the "-Wl,-z,notext" thing at all. It fails to explain
> why things are working OK in v11/HEAD, wh
Larry Rosenman writes:
> anyone want to look at this, or at least give me a clue on how to add
> this to 10 & below?
I do not like the "-Wl,-z,notext" thing at all. It fails to explain
why things are working OK in v11/HEAD, which makes me think that it's
band-aiding something rather than really
On Thu, Jul 05, 2018 at 07:47:39AM -0500, Larry Rosenman wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 04, 2018 at 08:37:40PM -0500, Larry Rosenman wrote:
> > On Wed, Jul 04, 2018 at 08:19:48PM -0500, Larry Rosenman wrote:
> > > On Thu, Jul 05, 2018 at 12:56:49PM +1200, Thomas Munro wrote:
> > > > On Thu, Jul 5, 2018 at 12
On Wed, Jul 04, 2018 at 08:37:40PM -0500, Larry Rosenman wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 04, 2018 at 08:19:48PM -0500, Larry Rosenman wrote:
> > On Thu, Jul 05, 2018 at 12:56:49PM +1200, Thomas Munro wrote:
> > > On Thu, Jul 5, 2018 at 12:35 PM, Larry Rosenman wrote:
> > > > I agree. Is there an easy way I
On Wed, Jul 04, 2018 at 08:19:48PM -0500, Larry Rosenman wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 05, 2018 at 12:56:49PM +1200, Thomas Munro wrote:
> > On Thu, Jul 5, 2018 at 12:35 PM, Larry Rosenman wrote:
> > > I agree. Is there an easy way I can add this work around to peripatus'
> > > source tree:
> > >
> > > It
On Thu, Jul 05, 2018 at 12:56:49PM +1200, Thomas Munro wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 5, 2018 at 12:35 PM, Larry Rosenman wrote:
> > I agree. Is there an easy way I can add this work around to peripatus'
> > source tree:
> >
> > It may be that adding "LDFLAGS+= -Wl,-z,notext" (and removing LLD_UNSAFE)
> >
On Thu, Jul 5, 2018 at 12:35 PM, Larry Rosenman wrote:
> I agree. Is there an easy way I can add this work around to peripatus'
> source tree:
>
> It may be that adding "LDFLAGS+= -Wl,-z,notext" (and removing LLD_UNSAFE)
> will let the port build with lld.
Maybe something like this at the end o
On Wed, Jul 04, 2018 at 07:35:28PM -0500, Larry Rosenman wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 05, 2018 at 12:30:37PM +1200, Thomas Munro wrote:
> > On Thu, Jul 5, 2018 at 11:43 AM, Larry Rosenman wrote:
> > > I noticed my buildfarm member peripatus hadn't been building due to me
> > > missing a perl library. Aft
On Thu, Jul 05, 2018 at 12:30:37PM +1200, Thomas Munro wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 5, 2018 at 11:43 AM, Larry Rosenman wrote:
> > I noticed my buildfarm member peripatus hadn't been building due to me
> > missing a perl library. After I fixed that I get failures on:
> >
> > Buildfarm member peripatus fa
On Thu, Jul 5, 2018 at 11:43 AM, Larry Rosenman wrote:
> I noticed my buildfarm member peripatus hadn't been building due to me
> missing a perl library. After I fixed that I get failures on:
>
> Buildfarm member peripatus failed on REL9_3_STABLE stage Make
> Buildfarm member peripatus failed on
I noticed my buildfarm member peripatus hadn't been building due to me
missing a perl library. After I fixed that I get failures on:
Buildfarm member peripatus failed on REL9_3_STABLE stage Make
Buildfarm member peripatus failed on REL9_4_STABLE stage Make
Buildfarm member peripatus failed on REL
26 matches
Mail list logo
