On Mon, Aug 29, 2022 at 01:46:25PM +0200, Daniel Gustafsson wrote:
> As written these tests aren't providing more coverage, they run more code but
> they don't ensure that the produced output is correct. If you write these
> tests with validation on the output they will be a lot more interesting.
> On 29 Aug 2022, at 13:26, Dong Wook Lee wrote:
> I add a tiny test to pg_checksum for coverage.
> I checked it improve test coverage 77.9% -> 87.7%.
+# Checksums are verified if --progress arguments are specified
+command_ok(
+ [ 'pg_checksums', '--progress', '-D', $pgdata ],
+ "ve
Hi,
I add a tiny test to pg_checksum for coverage.
I checked it improve test coverage 77.9% -> 87.7%.
---
Regards,
DongWook Lee.
v1_add_test_to_pg_checksum.patch
Description: Binary data
